Talk:Coeliac disease#rfc 460535C
{{Talk header}}
{{notice|Coeliac/Celiac: Please read prior discussions regarding the name of this article at /Archive 1#Requested move.}}
{{British English}}
{{ArticleHistory
|action1=FAC
|action1date=21:48, 8 January 2006
|action1link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Coeliac disease/Archive1
|action1result=not promoted
|action1oldid=34408836
|action2=FAC
|action2date=16:41, 26 March 2007
|action2link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Coeliac disease
|action2result=promoted
|action2oldid=117877059
|currentstatus=FA
|maindate=May 18, 2008
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell |class=FA|listas=Coeliac disease|1=
{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=High|genetics=yes|selected=yes|genetics-imp=mid|gastroenterology=yes|gastroenterology-imp=top|needs-infobox=no|needs-photo=no}}
}}
{{Reliable sources for medical articles|synonym1=Celiac+disease|synonym2=Celiac+sprue}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|maxarchivesize = 150K
|counter = 6
|minthreadsleft = 1
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(60d)
|archive = Talk:Coeliac disease/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{archive box|
}}
Getting rid of autism content in the article
Hello! I noticed that this article for Coeliac disease is for some reason included as a Low-importance article in the Wikipedia Autism project (which has, on its project page, a defined scope that clearly does not include medical issues other than autism). This Coeliac article also has some blatantly irrelevant content on the unsupported idea that a gluten-free diet treats Autism Spectrum Disorder. The content has 3 of its own sources, but the sources relate only to Non-Coeliac Gluten Sensitivity. I would like to correspond with another editor before deleting the content, but this is a featured article that demands exemplar quality and relevance. EnjoyLightEnjoyTruth (talk) 18:50, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
:Went ahead and deleted the paragraph about Autism. On April 18th, posted here to request input from other editors; decided to be bold and delete after over 20 days of silence.
:The content was nice but was a relic from the article's distant past that, in a modern scientific context, clearly does not relate to Coeliac disease. Plus, this is a featured article which shouldn't have any persistent errors and which should serve as an example in all ways for new articles to follow. EnjoyLightEnjoyTruth (talk) 00:46, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
::Thank you. Agree not relevant to Coeliac disease Jrfw51 (talk) 10:47, 15 May 2025 (UTC)