Talk:Cold fusion

{{Article history

|action1=FAC

|action1date=23:33, 16 Aug 2004

|action1link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cold fusion/archive1

|action1result=promoted

|action1oldid=5255762

|action2=FAR

|action2date=18:42, 6 January 2006

|action2link=Wikipedia:Featured article review/Cold fusion

|action2result=demoted

|action2oldid=34106403

|action3=PR

|action3date=22:10, 3 June 2006

|action3link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Cold fusion/archive1

|action3result=reviewed

|action3oldid=56726749

|action4=GAN

|action4date=18:18, 7 June 2006

|action4link=Talk:Cold_fusion/Archive_9#GA_promotion

|action4result=listed

|action4oldid=57340784

|action5=GAR

|action5date=21:52, 19 July 2006

|action5link=Talk:Cold_fusion/Archive_10#Delisted_from_Good_Article

|action5result=delisted

|action5oldid=64608162

|action6=GAN

|action6date=14:29, 26 December 2006

|action6link=Talk:Cold_fusion#GA_on_hold review

|action6result=not listed

|action6oldid=96546570

|action7=GAN

|action7date=02:00, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

|action7link=Talk:Cold_fusion/Archive_15#GA_Review

|action7result=listed

|action7oldid=215417474

| action8 = GAR

| action8date = 22:48, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

| action8link = Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Cold fusion/1

| action8result = delisted

| action8oldid =

|maindate=August 24, 2004

|currentstatus=DGA

|otd1date=2012-03-23|otd1oldid=483531088

|otd2date=2014-03-23|otd2oldid=600909183

|otd3date=2017-03-23|otd3oldid=771633321

|otd4date=2019-03-23|otd4oldid=888975125

|otd5date=2024-03-23|otd5oldid=1214943052

|otd6date=2025-03-23|otd6oldid=1281734433

}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=

}}

{{press

|author= Stephen Foley

|date= 3 February 2009

|url= http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/features/so-is-wikipedia-cracking-up-1543527.html

|title= So is Wikipedia cracking up?:It was a utopian vision: an encyclopedia for the people, by the people. But eight years on, Wikipedia is plagued by endless hoaxes, and lurches from one cash crisis to another. Will it become a footnote in the history of the web?

|org= The Independent

|section= Home:Life&Style:Gadgets&Tech:Features

|collapsed=yes}}

{{merged-from |List of references to cold fusion in popular culture}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{aan}}

|maxarchivesize = 250K

|counter = 49

|minthreadsleft = 0

|minthreadstoarchive = 1

|algo = old(180d)

|archive = Talk:Cold fusion/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn

|target=Talk:Cold_fusion/Archive_index

|mask=Talk:Cold fusion/Archive <#>

|leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes

}}

Rename article to LENR (Low-energy Nuclear Reactions)

This has become the accepted name in the field of research , with ICCF as its conference name. The present article is about the historic Ponds-fleischmann experiment which is now a tiny subset of modern investigations. So a new umbrella article is needed, which over time would be expanded by users to encompass a categorized list of sub areasLawrence18uk (talk) 05:19, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

:The people who still believe in this can change the in-universe name to "Squirrel manticore foomp" for all we care. Cold fusion is the common name. --Hob Gadling (talk) 10:31, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Cultural reference

Tom and Ray Magliozzi mentioned Pons and Fleischman numerous times on Car Talk, when discussing "bogusity" 24.45.58.149 (talk) 17:18, 16 March 2025 (UTC)