Talk:Colorado State Highway 74
{{Article history| action1 = GAN
| action1date = 19:22, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
| action1link = Talk:Colorado State Highway 74/GA1
| action1result = listed
| action1oldid = 365284374
|action2=WAR
|action2date=02:05, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
|action2link=Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/Assessment/A-Class Review/Colorado State Highway 74
|action2result=failed
|action2oldid=473967907
| dykdate = 28 May 2010
| dykentry = ... that to prevent flooding on Colorado State Highway 74, 34-foot high walls were constructed along the road?
| currentstatus = GA
| topic = engtech
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|1=
{{WikiProject U.S. Roads|state=CO|type=SH|class=GA|importance=mid|needs-jctint=no|needs-map=no|PUSRD-DYK=December 2015}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|CO=Yes|CO-importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject National Register of Historic Places|importance=low}}
}}
{{Talk:Colorado State Highway 74/GA1}}
Map
How can this be a GA without a map showing actually where it is? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. Blofeld (talk • contribs) 16:01, 1 June 2010
:I don't disagree - in fact, I agree entirely - but having a map isn't part of the Wikipedia-wide GA criteria, thus an article really can't be docked for not having one. I've said this on more than one occasion: I personally don't believe a road article is a "good article" if it doesn't have a map and I would never nominate an article for GA that doesn't have one, but unless the GA criteria makes having images and/or diagrams mandatory, I don't see a lack of a map as ever becoming a valid reason to fail a nomination. – TMF 19:26, 1 June 2010 (UTC)