Talk:Communications Security Establishment
{{Talkheader}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
{{WikiProject Canada|military=yes|importance=mid|Ottawa=yes|Ottawa-importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Cryptography|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Mass surveillance|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Military history
|class=C
|1=
|B-Class-1=no
|B-Class-2=yes
|B-Class-3=yes
|B-Class-4=yes
|B-Class-5=yes
|Canadian-task-force=yes
|Intel-task-force=yes}}
{{WikiProject Espionage|importance=Low}}
}}
{{Canadian English}}
Clarification
The reference to 'National Defense Dept.' is not clear to me.
They answer to the Minister of National Defence (with a "C" ;) )
as you can see here:
http://www.cse-cst.gc.ca/privacy/parliament-e.html
Recently dead link
This web page recently went offline; I'm noting it here in case it resurfaces...
- [http://watserv1.uwaterloo.ca/~brobinso/cse.html Communications Security Establishment - Unofficial Website]
— Matt 08:07, 4 May 2004 (UTC)
As I understood it the actual name is CSE:National Defense. That's what I have seen CSE called on their collective agreements when I worked at a federal labour law library. Dan Carkner
: They seem to use "Communications Security Establishment" on their website. Their FAQ says, "''2. When was CSE established? A:
CSE was formally established, by an Order-in-Council, in 1946 as the Communications Branch, National Research Council. In 1975, it was renamed the Communications Security Establishment and moved to the National Defence portfolio''". I'd hazard an uninformed guess that the qualifier "National Defence" indicates what department of government the agency falls under. — Matt Crypto 19:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Building
They're still in the Sir Leonard Tilley Building, not the Sir Edward Drake building (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON). However, they are slowly moving (expanding) back into the SED.
Maybe a part of the Canadian part of ECHELON could be incorporated here? They're a little off with some of the numbers, though. As for the source of the 1600+ staff, see http://www.hrma-agrh.gc.ca/pas-srp/report-rapport_e.asp?cat=f
The press kit (http://www.cse-cst.gc.ca/documents/media-room/media-kit.pdf) gives 2004 numbers at 1200 people, budget of almost $200CAD, almost double the $110CAD stated in the ECHELON page.
The biannual Ottawa Artsfest is also the only way I know of that a person can gain access to the building and at least walk through the halls. This is quite a treat, since in 2004, they had a Cray MP in one of the foyers, and in 2006, a Cray X-MP/24 (like the Y-MP but with dark blue instead of red panels).
I don't really know what kind of information should go into the CSE page, but I've been there (2004, 2006) and I have a friend who works there.
The facilities section appears to be out of date and in need of a rewrite. In particular, it seems that CSE no longer occupies either the Sir Leonard Tilley Building or 1500 Bronson Ave (also once called the Edward Drake Building, confusingly) at the Confederation Heights campus ever since they moved into their new headquarters on Ogilvie Road. Moreover, their current headquarters, the (new) Edward Drake Building might be deserving of its own article. PeregrineFlight (talk) 19:35, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Redirection from CSE
References
prism and org. crime, and telephone surveillance hacks.
In recent years in southern BC the telephone systems operators have been repeatedly advised of cell phone hacking by org. crime. when the RCMP was asked to refer the matter to CSE, the officer refused and due to vast and layers of intense corruption in the RCMP due to drugs, infiltration etc. the RCMP failed even make the minimal effort to assist those who were making the complaints. in Obamas version of reality, org. crime can't use judges, crown attorney, police etc. cell phone hacking by security forces to defeat the law? opinions welcome184.70.114.90 (talk) 20:44, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Portuguese link not going to Communications Security Establishment
The portuguese link of this page is being directed to a soccer club and not to "Communications Security Establishment" which would be the correct portuguese version of the page. It is being redirected (wrongly) to "Clube Sociedade Esportiva". Can anyone correct this? I did try but couldn't - it always return to the soccer club.thank you.Talencar (talk) 07:22, 15 April 2014 (UTC)Talencar
As per previous topic, "The portuguese link of this page is being directed to a soccer club and not to "Communications Security Establishment" which would be the correct portuguese version of the page. It is being redirected (wrongly) to "Clube Sociedade Esportiva".".
Can this be corrected? I also couldn't and it always return to the soccer club.Thank you. RACHNEL1000 (talk) 12:37, 25 April 2014 (UTC)RACHNEL1000
Official Shield
Buenos-ding-dong-diddly-dias:
I noticed that the official shield does not exactly match the English translation, that is, I think it would be better if the shield read "informationem" rather than "nuntium." I think "nuntium" is more like "announcement." You might like to pass that on to the agency, as presumptuous as it may seem.
Of course, the shield was probably designed by an expert in Latin...
Adios,
70.72.45.131 (talk) 17:30, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Communications Security Establishment. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=795008853 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071129214053/http://www.cse-cst.gc.ca/privacy/protecting-privacy-e.html to http://www.cse-cst.gc.ca/privacy/protecting-privacy-e.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100324210617/http://www.ocsec-bccst.gc.ca/mandate/index_e.php to http://www.ocsec-bccst.gc.ca/mandate/index_e.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080306064929/http://montreal.ctv.ca/cfcf/news/oys%26id%3D1367 to http://montreal.ctv.ca/cfcf/news/oys%26id%3D1367
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130616170950/http://secretspying.ca/ to http://secretspying.ca/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090206135412/http://ocsec-bccst.gc.ca/index_e.php to http://www.ocsec-bccst.gc.ca/index_e.php/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101012165353/http://www.img.forces.gc.ca/index-eng.asp to http://www.img.forces.gc.ca/index-eng.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090208001508/http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/prg/em/ccirc/index-eng.aspx to http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/prg/em/ccirc/index-eng.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:23, 11 August 2017 (UTC)