Talk:Computer animation#Zero references.3F

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=

{{WikiProject Animation|importance=top|computer-animation=yes|computer-animation-importance=Top}}

}}

{{Connected contributor|Caprockranger|Computer animation|declared=yes|otherlinks= COI declared [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACaprockranger&type=revision&diff=664546607&oldid=664518500 here]}}

{{To do|* {{ null | revisionid=608128415 | Frozen }} -- 22:03, 11 May 2014 (UTC)}}

{{Educational assignment|month=02|year=2013|link=Wikipedia:School_and_university_projects/Interaction_Experience_and_Engagement_2013}}

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis

|archiveprefix=Talk:Computer animation/Archives/

|format=Y/F

|age=720

|minkeepthreads=4

|archivebox=yes

|box-advert=yes

}}

Splitting 3D and 2D into two different categories

Hello,

Over the next few weeks I plan to separate the topics of 3D and 2D animation into two separate categories as is noted on this article's "To-do list." I will be sure to preserve the content and particularly focus on making the article more readable and organized by allowing each sub topic to have its own section. Feel free to leave any suggestions here or questions about what I will do here. ZacZig (talk) 18:07, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

:I definitely support. —theMainLogan (t•c) 01:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

:is this still happening? Some related articles that also need some work are virtual cinematography, and the Traditional animation article, which is terribly named and mixes digital 2D animation and hand-drawn cel animation. — jonas (talk) 05:10, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

:File:Symbol support vote.svg Support They are entirely different. RuzDD (talk) 11:59, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

::So, it's been over a year. Shall we do the split? Lililolol (talk) 04:11, 5 June 2025 (UTC)