Talk:Conditions comorbid to autism/Archive 1
{{Talk archive}}
Obsessive-compulsive disorder
"Obsessive-compulsive disorder is characterized by recurrent obsessional thoughts or compulsive acts.
[...]
Compulsive acts or rituals are stereotyped behaviours that are repeated again and again. They are not inherently enjoyable, nor do they result in the completion of inherently useful tasks."
I think we should add: in the case of OCD, compulsive acts are used to decrease the anxiety which the obsessions entail. Apokrif 19:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Schizophrenia deletion
One entry on the page stated baldly that
:: ===Schizophrenia===
::"There is a link between Asperger's and Schizophrenia. [http://lists.becta.org.uk/pipermail/senco-forum/1998-January/000915.html Message on mailing list] maintained by BECTA, message by Elizabeth Farrar, January 11, 1998, accessed August 17, 2006
Now, I had a look at the source and it doesn't say that at all. And even if it did, it wouldn't really be up to scratch (imho) because it's FOAF-stuff on a message board.Garrick92 14:25, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
heart desease
I saw someware on the internat that ther is comorbid Congenital Heart Disease with autism.Can somobody source this?--Pixel ;-) 22:23, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Ordering
I suggest that these headings should be organized by prevalence. This is fairly wide spread information, or should be. I'll do some research and do some edits unless someone has some alternative suggestions? Sethwoodworth 00:43, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
ASD
There is a mention under the Fragile X syndrome section about ASD. It is not linked and there is no explanation. What is ASD? Sowsearsoup 17:57, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
:It's autism-spectrum disorders (autism and related disorders), I believe. We should fix that acronym so it's more comprehensible - thanks for pointing it out. MastCell Talk 18:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Epilepsy
The comorbidity rate is all over the place:
- {{PMID|19454962}} : "prevalence estimates vary from as little as 5% to as much as 46%... Recently, there has been interest in the occurrence of epileptiform electroencephalograms (EEGs) even in the absence of epilepsy. Rates as high as 60% have been reported and some investigators propose that these abnormalities may play a causal role in the autism phenotype."
- {{PMID|19006654}} [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2734903/?tool=pubmed] : "Approximately 30% of children with autism have epilepsy [13] and 30% of children with epilepsy, at least those seen in a tertiary epilepsy clinic, have autism [14]."
- {{PMID|18766157}} : "Autism is associated with a high frequency of epileptiform EEG abnormalities (prevalence range 10.3-72.4%) and epilepsy (prevalence range 0-44.5%)."
- {{PMID|18302129}} : "Epilepsy is quite common in autism spectrum disorders. The rate of comorbidity varies between 20-30% of cases, depending upon the age and type of disorder."
- {{PMID|18302128}} : "The rate of epilepsy in autism is higher than in other developmental disorders and estimates point to a frequency range of between 7% and 42%. Between 40% and 47% of autistic children suffer from clinical epilepsy."
From what I've seen, we take the highest and lowest estimates, but a range of 0% to 46% or 47% doesn't give much conclusive data. >.> MichaelExe (talk) 00:41, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
:A diagnosis of epilepsy doesn't require the child to have any developmental capabilities. Whereas ASD must be very hard (and ultimately pointless) to diagnose in a child who is severely developmentally disabled. I guess this makes it very difficult to gauge the prevalence of ASD in that population (where epilepsy is very common). If we quote a range, the range should come from one source IMO. Colin°Talk 08:00, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Proposed merge with [[Comorbidity in autism spectrum disorders]]
As with Medical conditions related to autism, this article is largely a duplicate of the "Conditions..." article; we do not need 2 articles that describe essentially the same information. Jinkinson talk to me What did he do now? 02:47, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
: I'd actually rather have everything go to that title (Comorbidity in autism spectrum disorders) rather than this title (Conditions comorbid to autism spectrum disorders). But, whatever, we have three articles that need to be one. We can just get it all there and then figure out a better name. I suspect this happened because whatever article we end up with needs to be listed in an autism template, so people realize it exists. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:20, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
:: I've prepped that article to be merged (much of it is outdated, the merge target typically has better info), and see that {{tl|Pervasive developmental disorders}] has this article (Conditions comorbid to autism spectrum disorders) so when I moved content from autism spectrum to Comorbidity in autism spectrum disorders, I created this unnecessary duplicate. I suppose I was trying to dump poorly cited trash :) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:04, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support merge. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:05, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
{{done}} SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:33, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
How well established is the link between GI problems and Autism?
The page currently states there is "a lack of published rigorous data to support the theory that autistic children have more or different GI symptoms than usual" and cites a 2005 analysis of the data. I have since found a decent 2012 study which finds a very strong link between GI problems and Autism: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22119694 Does this supersede by being more recent? or do we stick with the meta-analysis? Wikiditm (talk) 18:16, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Wakefield «misunderstood»?!
Dr. Wakefield's paper has not been withdrew «after a moral panic occurred, due to a misunderstanding that it blamed vaccination», but because it was a scientific fraud. And indeed it did blame vaccination! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.236.71.187 (talk) 07:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified {{plural:2|one external link|2 external links}} on Conditions comorbid to autism spectrum disorders. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=752088640 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150811064504/http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/ADHD%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf to http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/ADHD%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.asperger.org/Publications/Ehlers_and_Gillberg_Article.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:37, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Bipolar
This paragraph is very fuzzy and the paper cited for the first quite bold statement ("Bipolar disorder, or manic-depression, is a highly controversial diagnosis") is actually only referring to pediatric bipolar disorder (and thus the statement taken as is is completely false; bipolar disorder is not a remotely controversial diagnosis if you don't include the "pediatric". Autism is a lifelong disorder, just because it begins in childhood doesn't mean conditions can only be comorbid if they are also diagnosed in childhood. I don't even know where to begin to clean this up, maybe something involving this study?
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00702-004-0115-1?LI=true
Stahlberg, O., Soderstrom, H., Rastam, M. et al. J Neural Transm (2004) 111: 891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-004-0115-1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.112.58.255 (talk) 09:11, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Concern about source integrity
Should autism speaks be used as a source on this site, or should it be replaced with more reliable sources as a known conspiracy site?
Note: 2 of the 3 links appear broken or deleted. The working link does not relate to any conspiracies and seems to contain good information, as it references a real study done by actual scientists (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26052041/), though the article also recommends all autistic people get nutritionists, which is not supported by the study. -- 2001:56A:71BA:6800:E825:5731:1BDC:74A (talk) 13:43, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
ADHD excludes other PDDs
There should really be a lot more information on the medical bits. Also, regarding the mention of ADHD, it should be noted that its diagnosis excludes other PDDs, although it is arguably related to the autism spectrum.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.217.126.54 (talk) 21:04, 16 April 2005 (UTC)
The text says that asd and adhd can not be comorbid diagnosis per the dsm iv. is this really true? the only exclusion I see is for pdd not autism per se (though pdd-nos as been described as another spelling for asd's. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.7.163.64 (talk) 06:49, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
: That's what the cited source (Reiersen & Todd 2008, {{PMID|18416666}}) says. Eubulides (talk) 20:06, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
: At at least one point in time, autism, adhd and dyslexia, were considered exclusive. However, there are lots of people walking around with two or more of these diagnoses. -- 2001:56A:71BA:6800:E825:5731:1BDC:74A (talk) 13:48, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Branched-chain keto acid dehydrogenase kinase deficiency
Branched-chain keto acid dehydrogenase kinase deficiency presents as autism spectrum disorder, but the number of patients described in literature since its discovery is extremely small. I'm leaving the link here in case someone finds some goods sources. I'm not sure whether it merits inclusion just yet. --CopperKettle (talk) 13:40, 21 May 2022 (UTC)