Talk:Confucius Institute#rfc 99F9E80

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=

{{WikiProject Linguistics|applied=Yes|auto=Inherit|importance=Low}}

}}

{{Backwardscopy

|author = Miller, F. P., Vandome, A. F., & McBrewster, J.

|year = 2009

|title = Confucius Institute

|org = Alphascript Publishing

|comments = {{OCLC|704559436}}, {{ISBN|9786130242084}}.

|bot=LivingBot

}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{aan}}

|maxarchivesize = 256K

|counter = 2

|minthreadsleft = 1

|algo = old(90d)

|archive = Talk:Confucius Institute/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{Archives |auto=yes |search=yes |title=Archives|bot=lowercase sigmabot III|age=90 }}

Source / statement mismatch

I'm concerned that there's some POV pushing going on here. A study that demonstrated that Confucius Institute was not systematically being used to push political narratives was being used as a source for a statement saying that CI was impactful on scientific freedom - something the source didn't mention at all. I guess the question is whether anyone has done a comprehensive source review? Are we likely to find more sources that completely fail verification? Simonm223 (talk) 15:31, 14 February 2025 (UTC)