Login
Login

Talk:Consciousness#Reference for definition of consciousness

{{Talk header}}

{{Article history

|action1=GAN

|action1date=19:37, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

|action1link=Talk:Consciousness/GA1

|action1result=listed

|action1oldid=458342969

|topic=philrelig

|action2 = GAR

|action2date = 15:25, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

|action2link = Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Consciousness/1

|action2result = delisted

|action2oldid = 1258754775

|currentstatus = DGA

}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=c|vital=yes|1=

{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=Mid}}

{{WikiProject Neuroscience|importance=Top}}

{{WikiProject Epilepsy|importance=mid}}

{{WikiProject Philosophy|importance=High|science=yes|mind=yes|continental=yes|analytic=yes|modern=yes|contemporary=yes}}

{{WikiProject Psychology|importance=Top}}

{{WikiProject Cognitive science|importance=High}}

}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}

|maxarchivesize = 120K

|counter = 5

|minthreadsleft = 4

|minthreadstoarchive = 1

|algo = old(100d)

|archive = Talk:Consciousness/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{Portal box|Medicine|Philosophy}}

{{Broken anchors|links=

}}

Untitled

Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived.

If further archiving is needed, see Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.

Philosophy of mind

Removed uncitated sources saying default is historical one.added source citated showing dominant position in philosophy of mind is physicalism Orexin (talk) 05:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

GA concerns

I am concerned that this article doesn't follow the good article criteria anymore. Some of my concerns are highlighted below:

  • There is a lot of uncited text throughout the article.
  • There are some sections that rely upon block quotes. This creates copyright concerns and increases the word count. This information might be better as summarised prose.
  • The article, at over 11,000 words, is above the recommended length at WP:TOOBIG. I think this might be a sign that this is too detailed. I think removing most of the block quotes will resolve this, but the article should be edited for too much detail.
  • The lead does not summarise all major aspects of the article.

Is anyone interested in fixing up this article or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 18:52, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

{{Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Consciousness/1}}