Talk:Consensus decision-making

{{User:MiszaBot/config

| algo = old(365d)

| archive = Talk:Consensus decision-making/Archive %(counter)d

| counter = 2

| maxarchivesize = 150K

| archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}

| minthreadstoarchive = 1

| minthreadsleft = 2

}}

{{Notice|Consensus was merged here. See Talk:Consensus for more discussion history.}}

{{Old AfD multi

| date = August 8, 2007

| result = keep

| page = Consensus decision-making

}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=

}}

{{old move|date=14 September 2023|destination=Consensus|result=not moved|link=Special:Permalink/1176308087#Requested move 14 September 2023}}

Relation to consensus article

There is a separate, short, article on consensus to contain definitions of consensus from computer science, and give a short overview with examples to those not interested in the decision making implications. If that structure is clunky, then the title 'consensus' should be used for all of this material, resulting in a very long article that would have to cover both technical and poltical uses of the term. probably undesirable. A proposal to merge the two articles was discussed in May 2006 (see Archive 1). The result was No merge.

Bad move

[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Consensus_(decision-making)&oldid=1257709083 07:39, 16 November 2024] ModernDaySlavery talk contribs m 73,971 bytes 0 ModernDaySlavery moved page Consensus decision-making to Consensus (decision-making): Better title)

This was a bad move. SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:14, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

:Look up google number of results:

:"consensus decision-making"

:About 257,000 results

:"consensus" "decision-making" -"consensus decision-making"

:About 127,000,000 results

:ModernDaySlavery (talk) 08:25, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

::That’s not a good algorithm. SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:36, 17 November 2024 (UTC)