Talk:Contrast-induced nephropathy

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|

{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=low|radiology=yes|radiology-imp=mid|nephrology=yes|nephrology-imp=mid}}

}}

{{Reliable sources for medical articles}}

Prognosis

Is the nephropathy permanent or how long does it last ? Rod57 (talk) 15:51, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Usually lasts 5-10 days. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.115.83.140 (talk) 05:12, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Under 'prophylactic hemodialysis" the reference does not seem to point correctly. At least, following it and getting the article and reading it does not seem to suggest this. In fact, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11747848 seems to refute it! I'm not a doctor so some clarification would help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.228.199.20 (talk) 08:00, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

So what?

This article describes the parameters of contrast-induced nephropathy, but it does not say that it is a problem. Does it matter if somebody gets this condition? You might think so because it has "pathy" in the name, but for all I can tell from what is written here, it does not have any significance to the patient. 130.167.180.22 (talk) 16:31, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Does it exist?

Not necessarily doi:10.1148/radiol.12121460 JFW | T@lk 21:41, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Review

... in Circulation doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.014672 JFW | T@lk 15:36, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Acetylcysteine works...

... in people who have low-osmolality contrast media in particular: doi:10.7326/M15-1456. In comparison, no LOCM was associated with more CIN than the other doi:10.7326/M15-1402 JFW | T@lk 09:50, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Signs & Symptoms

Shouldnt there be a signs and symptoms section of thos article on a medical outcome? Not to mention this article seems a little one sided by someone with an agenda to prove this doesn’t ever happen. Even had multiple of the same places cited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.20.194.86 (talk) 06:04, 11 October 2018 (UTC)