Talk:County Road 854 (Miami-Dade County, Florida)

:The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus. As long as it's in line with standards, it may make sense to rewrite the article first. --BDD (talk) 18:43, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

:County Road 854 (Miami-Dade County, Florida) → {{no redirect|Florida State Road 854}} – County routes are not notable enough for individual articles whereas state highways, whether current or former, are. Article title should therefore reflect the notable former state highway designation. --Relisted. ^walk victor falk ^talk 15:50, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Dough4872 02:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

:That's silly. Transferring maintenance from the state to the county (and cities?) didn't change the importance of the road. Not to mention that, according to FDOT maps, it appears that SR 854 may have gone only from US 441 to I-95. --NE2 02:49, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

::Again, county routes are not notable enough for their own articles. The article should be refactored to focus on the former SR 854 with the history and RD mentioning the CR extensions beyond the former SR. Dough4872 02:56, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

:::The parts of the road that were (apparently) never a state road are just as important as the former state road. I'm utterly baffled by your rationale: we should only talk about the segment that the state happened to take over 30 years ago, probably because the rest of the corridor was already built? Is this some sort of Catholic dogma stuff where we must follow the rules even if they make no sense? --NE2 03:06, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.