Talk:Coverity

This is personal experience, so I'm not prepared to change the original article, but I don't think ccplint should be mentioned as a competitor to Coverity. We've just performed a two day evaluation with Coverity, and ccplint has an entirely different function and purpose.

Also, it's refershing to know Google advocates One True Brace!

--Woolhiser (talk) 20:01, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Links [3] and [4] are broken — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.97.87.228 (talk) 17:52, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Should be cited => [http://www.coverity.com/press-releases/libreoffice-makes-strides-in-software-quality-with-coverity-scan/ LibreOffice Makes Strides in Software Quality with Coverity Scan] --Kizar (talk) 11:07, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Coverity. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=795388601 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081010164925/http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/06/30/Coverity-buys-Solidware-to-boost-code-analysis_1.html to http://infoworld.com/article/08/06/30/Coverity-buys-Solidware-to-boost-code-analysis_1.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/security/0%2C39044215%2C39315781%2C00.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130526101953/http://www.softwaremag.com/content/ContentCT.asp?P=3169 to http://www.softwaremag.com/content/ContentCT.asp?P=3169

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:46, 13 August 2017 (UTC)