Talk:Cramer–Shoup cryptosystem
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Cryptography|importance=High}}
}}
The following is incorrect. Elgamal is also a probabilistic cryptosystem. The advantage of Cramer-Shoup is the verification stage in the decryption algorithm:
:In contrast to ElGamal, which is extremely malleable, Cramer-Shoup introduces a random element into the encryption process, such that a given plaintext will produce different ciphertexts on subsequent runs of the system. The consequence is that, unlike ElGamal and RSA (without padding), Cramer-Shoup is not susceptible to chosen ciphertext attack.
Anyone know the licensing information? This would probably be good to include.--Wpegden 07:07, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
H(u1, u2, e)
Every cryptographic hash function that I know of takes one argument. How does one pass three arguments? 141.149.207.158 04:17, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
:It makes a hash of the combination. I guess you could say H(u1 || u2 || e) would do the trick. 129.241.211.76 (talk)
Collision resistance vs. UOWHF
Hmm, I have just taken a look at the original paper, and I found out that the property required from the hash function is not exactly collision resistance, but being drawn from a Universal One-Way Hash Function family, which is more like second preimage resistance (it is easier to achieve than collision resistance)... charles bouillaguet
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cramer–Shoup cryptosystem. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=795425961 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060426194426/http://packetstorm.linuxsecurity.com/mag/crypto-gram/crypto-gram-9809.html to http://packetstorm.linuxsecurity.com/mag/crypto-gram/crypto-gram-9809.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC)