Talk:Creation Museum#rfc D2021EB

{{Talk header}}

{{Controversial}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|

{{WikiProject United States|importance=Mid|KY=yes|KY-importance=Mid}}

{{WikiProject Creationism|importance=Low|Young Earth creationism=yes|Young Earth creationism-importance=Mid}}

{{WikiProject Museums|importance=Low}}

}}

{{COI editnotice}}

{{ArbComPseudoscience}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{aan}}

|maxarchivesize = 200K

|counter = 7

|minthreadsleft = 2

|minthreadstoarchive = 1

|algo = old(90d)

|archive = Talk:Creation Museum/Archive %(counter)d

}}

"Creationusuem" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]

30px

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Creationusuem and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 17#Creationusuem until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. TNstingray (talk) 23:05, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Tone is biased. Sections of overview should be moved to criticism area.

Move the criticism to the criticism area 2600:1009:B06C:BEFC:6C6A:F4E9:D77A:7CB7 (talk) 14:24, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

:There is a longstanding consensus to use that word here. Theroadislong (talk) 14:26, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

:Why? who says it is science? Slatersteven (talk) 14:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC)