Talk:Cryogenic Rare Event Search with Superconducting Thermometers#Requested move 8 May 2019

:The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. I was going to boldly move CRESST as suggested below but I notice that {{ul|Ronhjones}} moved it the other direction in 2017, so probably worth a new RM if you want to pursue it. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:09, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

----

:Cryogenic Rare Event Search with Superconducting Thermometers → {{no redirect|CRESST (experiment)}} – The scientific literature (including both primary and secondary sources) only ever refer to this by its acronym. It is unclear whether this is primary over the subject currently discussed at CRESST, or vice versa. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:22, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

• Oppose Convention in scientific literature is to fully name a thing, introduce its acronym, and then use the acronym going forward. I would want to see broad evidence to the contrary before supporting this change. For what its worth, though, I think the institute currently at CRESST should be fully named in its title as well. Safrolic (talk) 16:35, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

----

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.