Talk:CryptoZoo
{{Gs/talk notice|crypto}}
{{WikiProject banner shell |blp=other |class=Start |1=
{{WikiProject Cryptocurrency |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject YouTube |importance=Low |needs-infobox=yes}}
}}
{{old move|date=4 January 2025|from=CryptoZoo (video game)|destination=CryptoZoo|result=moved|link=Special:Permalink/1268564884#Requested move 4 January 2025}}
Requested move 4 January 2025
:The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bobby Cohn (talk) 21:55, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
----
:CryptoZoo (video game) → {{no redirect|CryptoZoo}} – per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization)#Page names that differ only by capitalization. I don't particularly see why this page would be an exception. Neo Purgatorio (pester!) 20:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
:Note: WikiProject Cryptocurrency and WikiProject YouTube have been notified of this discussion. Neo Purgatorio (pester!) 20:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per nom - Also, I'm not sure this is primarily notable as a video game. Even before it completely collapsed, sources were skeptical that this NFT project would or even theoretically could ever materialize as presented. Calling it a video game is giving it more credit than it deserves. Grayfell (talk) 03:35, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Unilandofma(Talk to me!) 11:33, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Grayfell brings up a lot of good points in their comment, so I don't have much to say. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 11:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC)