Talk:Cured-in-place pipe

Does anyone know how big the CIPP industry is in the United States? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.61.45.147 (talk • contribs) 18:51, 19 August 2010‎

The word "inversion" here seems to have a special meaning in this article, but is not explained. It does not seem to mean to turn something upside down. Why would one do that?

71.189.115.144 (talk) 17:59, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

: I agree - wiktionary:invert has a number of definitions but none of them quite make sense for how it's used in creating a cured-in-place pipe. --Marc Kupper|talk 22:10, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

: I found a video on http://www.maxlinerusa.com/. It looks like their system is to insert a long bag (a sleeve, liner, or bladder) into the pipe under pressure and the way they feed the bag also means they are inverting it. I believe they invert it again to remove the bag.

: http://www.easy-liner.com/lining_supplies/pipe/index.html is a page where they are selling what they call "Tube Pipe Lining Bladders" and on the detail pages for the products the processes or techniques described as Invert and Invert, Pull-in and Invert, and Double Inversion. The first two I can visualize. I'm not sure what "Double Inversion" other than perhaps a distinction between which end(s) they start the inversion from. --Marc Kupper|talk 23:02, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

We need a better source but http://www.formadrain.com/frequently-asked-questions/ lists a couple of of disadvantages that are not covered by the current article.

• The existing pipe needs to be clean. "anything that was there will stay trapped between the liner and the host pipe forever (ex: rocks, roots, grease)."
• There's a four hour time limit from manufacturing a pipe to when you can start curing. The "pipe" is constructed in a shop, rolled up, transported to the job site, pulled through the pipe that's being re-lined, and then you can start curing the new pipe or pipe-liner. I assume other cured-in-place pipe technologies would have similar time limits.

--Marc Kupper|talk 22:28, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

At present pipelining is for a computer term. It appears the term is also used for cured-in-place pipe.

This [http://www.brinksservices.net/pipelining.php plumber's web page] says they offer "pipelining" using products/systems from the following vendors:

• CuraFlo - they do not seem to use the term 'cured in place' [http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Acuraflo.com+cured+in+place site:curaflo.com cured in place].

need to research www.curaflo.com to see if they call their product "Cured-in-place pipe"

• Formadrain - many hits for [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=site%3Aformadrain.com+cured+in+place&gbv=2&oq=site%3Aformadrain.com+cured+in+place site:formadrain.com cured in place].
• Easyliner - www.easy-liner.com has many references to "CIPP" and a few for [http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aeasy-liner.com+cured+in+place&hl=en "Cured in Place Pipe Lining"].
• [http://www.brinksservices.net/maxliner.php Maxliner] says "Maxliner is a leading cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) lining system" and Google for [http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Amaxlinerusa.com+cured+in+place&hl=en site:maxlinerusa.com cured in place] supports that they use the term "Cured-in-place Pipe (CIPP)."

I suspect that's enough evidence to redirect Pipe lining to this article and so did that. I don't know if "pipelining" as CIPP is common enough to merit a note on the pipelining article. --Marc Kupper|talk 22:50, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:2|one external link|2 external links}} on Cured-in-place pipe. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=752821098 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080418081753/http://www.e-wef.org:80/timssnet/static/OM/WPM404.htm to http://www.e-wef.org/timssnet/static/OM/WPM404.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130502190259/http://virginiadot.org/ to http://www.virginiadot.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:13, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cured-in-place pipe. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=795641828 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.e-wef.org/timssnet/static/OM/WPM404.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061109060923/http://www.trenchlessonline.com/pdfs/06_magazines/prg_all.pdf to http://www.trenchlessonline.com/pdfs/06_magazines/prg_all.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070911014303/http://www.insituform.com/content/190/how_insituform_cipp_is_installed.aspx to http://www.insituform.com/content/190/how_insituform_cipp_is_installed.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:13, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cured-in-place pipe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929100247/http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/5736166-description.html to http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/5736166-description.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:35, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

0.1 to 2.8 meters (2–110 inches).

0.1 m = 4 inches

Or is 2 in the correct value?

Helium4 (talk) 20:59, 27 May 2022 (UTC)