Talk:Cycloaddition
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Chemistry | importance = Mid}}
}}
IUPAC recommends:
[x+y] for the involved electrons
and
(x+y) for the involved atoms.
So:
Diels Alder is [2+4] and (2+4)
1,3-dipolar cycloaddition is [2+4] and (2+3).
Actually, many people still use [2+3] for the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition, but I think, the difference or the existence of both variants should be part of the text.
:I think that the [n#s + n#s] notation is better, where n is pi or sigma depending on what bonds are involved, # is the number of electrons, and s is either s or a for suprafacial or antarofacial..--Shniken1 (talk) 03:46, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Two notations
I clarified the two different notations. It all links to the IUPAC Gold Book but that should be sufficient. I also divided the photochemical and thermal reactions into different sections.
The Simple English article for this is actually quite good and may be worth porting to here.
as a non-chemist...
This page really incomprehensible. I admit to being terrible at chemistry but the use of "cyclic adduct" (undoubtedly a very basic concept), makes the definition appear circular to me.
I realize that this is cited as "standard definition".
As I understand it, it means a molecule/adduct is attached to a bond.
Then it can either break that bond to replace it with two new sigma-bonds to the adduct or leaving the original sigma-bond intact but forming two new ones from the pi-bonds (forming something like a triangle).
Would it be possible to simplify this by putting the formal definition later in the text, starting with an explanation in more layman's terms?
--Jaapkroe (talk) 14:01, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- the relevant internal links should be : cycloaddition => organic reaction between two unsaturated compounds to form a cyclic compound as the adduct. In this process Pi bonds in the reagents are replaced by sigma bonds in the product. This should make it more understandable V8rik (talk) 21:35, 2 July 2014 (UTC)