Talk:Daria Khaltourina

{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=C|listas=Khaltourina, Daria|1=

}}

{{Old AfD multi| date = 7 September 2012 (UTC) | result = no consensus | page = Daria Khaltourina }}

{{DYK talk|15 February|2012|entry=... that according to Russian sociologist Daria Khaltourina (pictured), Protestantism influenced positively the capitalist development of social systems through the promotion of literacy and Bible reading?}}

Source

Peace Print and Protestantism 1450 1558 by CSL Davies Fontan 1995,; already rehearsed and proposed these arguments in relation to literacy and trade. No reason that a current Russian academic would not know of this 85.210.0.29 (talk) 11:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Interest and bias

I don't think that there is enough evidence that this person is reputable, and the information does not sound impartial either. The whole highly praising tone of the article is fitting for a resume rather than objective information in an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not the place to advertize yourself (hint: your own website, linkedin, etc). Completely shameless. 87.64.58.250 (talk) 12:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

I agree.. delete this,. the objectivity of Wikipedia has reached an alltime low. And it wasn't a high standard to begin with — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.84.244.60 (talk) 12:39, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

:Either edit the article to fix the problem, or propose it for deletion. Do not persistently blank the page; you will be blocked. Yunshui 雲‍水 12:51, 15 February 2012 (UTC)