Talk:Delphi method

@Uclneaxel: Since I'm unsure how this highly detailed sentence which you contributed [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Delphi_method&diff=prev&oldid=970302753 here] fits into the broader context, I'm moving it here for possible comment:

The Delphi approach has been successfully employed to improve agreement between experts in iterative rating exercises on clinical test results using inter-rater kappa statistics as an outcome measure.{{cite journal | vauthors = Petzold A, Biousse V, Bursztyn L, Costello F, Crum A, Digre K, Fraser C, Fraser JA, Katz B, Jurkute N, Newman N, Lautrup-Battistini J, Lawlor M, Liskova P, Lorenz B, Malmqvist L, Peragallo J, Sibony P, Subramanian P, Rejdak R, Nowomiejska K, Touitou V, Warner J, Wegener M, Wong S, Yu-Wai-Man P, Hamann S | display-authors = 6 | title = Multirater Validation of Peripapillary Hyperreflective Ovoid Mass-like Structures (PHOMS) | journal = Neuro-Ophthalmology | volume = 44 | issue = 6 | pages = 413–414 | date = 16 July 2020 | pmid = 33408429 | pmc = 7746256 | doi = 10.1080/01658107.2020.1760891 }}

{{Reflist-talk}}

86.161.190.114 (talk) 15:43, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

:Thank you. I agree. Uclneaxel (talk) 18:37, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method is a notable absence under the variations subheading. It is commonly used in medical and clinical research settings with expert panels of specialist physicians.

https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2023/10/generating-evidence-using-the-delphi-method.html

https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/2011/MR1269.pdf Instantwatym (talk) 03:01, 28 July 2024 (UTC)