Talk:Diablo III#NPOV dispute - Reception

I think that act II is a little incorrect. I will replay Act II on my switch it make sure. In particular: Emperor Hakan II is a previous character from a lore. I thought Caldeum had an empress. Would you be okay if I change this? L10nM4st3r (1) (talk) 13:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

:Actually, nevermind. It has beeen a while since I last played. It is emperor. Maybe I was thinking of "Emperor Hakan I" L10nM4st3r (1) (talk) 13:57, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Diablo III. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=779280118 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120106025832/http://www.next-gen.biz/features/diablo-iiis-real-world-currency-auction-house to http://www.next-gen.biz/features/diablo-iiis-real-world-currency-auction-house
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=19381854055&pageNo=2
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120526010811/http://uk.gamespot.com/diablo-iii/reviews/diablo-iii-review-6378132/ to http://uk.gamespot.com/diablo-iii/reviews/diablo-iii-review-6378132/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:23, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Diablo III. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=799811904 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140903075734/http://www.gemoper.com/diablo-iii-ultimate-evil-edition/ to http://www.gemoper.com/diablo-iii-ultimate-evil-edition/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120804012143/http://www.diabloiiiblog.com/leveling/diablo-3-hardcore-mode-patch-14/ to http://www.diabloiiiblog.com/leveling/diablo-3-hardcore-mode-patch-14/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130706092050/http://uk.gamespot.com/features/if-youre-not-playing-diablo-iii-hardcore-youre-doing-it-wrong-6376560/ to http://uk.gamespot.com/features/if-youre-not-playing-diablo-iii-hardcore-youre-doing-it-wrong-6376560/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121013153204/http://www.gamearena.com.au/pc/games/title/diablo-3/reviews.php to http://www.gamearena.com.au/pc/games/title/diablo-3/reviews.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

In cases like this (Metacritic metascore 88 vs Users score 4.1), in which a game has very good reviews from official sites (which very often is part of the marketing), compared with general bad reviews from the users (also reflected on future sales and migration of the player base to the competition, like Path of Exile); shouldn't figure the Metacritic user note alongside official notes? Also maybe with an explanation about main gripes the community had about this game (like the real money auction house, the poor itemization, and the over simplification in gameplay). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antarte (talk • contribs) 21:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

:With the release of this video giving a very detailed and sourced review of the game's development, release, and reception, I feel like this original comment by Antarte has even more weight. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCRzuvwMDUs 2600:1700:4281:4100:0:0:0:32 (talk) 02:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

::This is not a reliable source by Wikipedia standards. Also this comment is 4 years old. -- ferret (talk) 02:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)