Talk:Diagonal matrix

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|vital=yes|1=

{{WikiProject Mathematics| importance = mid}}

}}

{{annual readership|scale=log}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

| algo = old(365d)

| archive = Talk:Diagonal matrix/Archive %(counter)d

| counter = 1

| maxarchivesize = 150K

| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}

| minthreadstoarchive = 1

| minthreadsleft = 5

}}

{{Archive box |search=yes |bot=Lowercase sigmabot III |age=12 |units=months |auto=yes }}

Simultaneously diagonalizable

Why does the page for "Simultaneously diagonalizable" redirect here, when there's no mention of the topic here? 131.215.105.153 (talk) 20:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Logical Force

In the opening, it says, "Thus, the matrix D = (di,j) with n columns and n rows is diagonal if:", but I think it should say "if and only if", otherwise it's not making a strong enough claim. Can someone confirm this? If so, please make the change. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.207.156.13 (talk) 14:16, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Operator diag()

This article might be the right place to mention the operator diag(u) that takes creates an (n \times n) diagonal matrix D from an (n \times 1) vector u such that D_{ii} = u_i. Or perhaps it deserves an article of its own?

It's already in use on wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commutator_subspace

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael.Clerx (talkcontribs) 05:44, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

:Support mentioning diag() in the present article. fgnievinski (talk) 19:16, 21 November 2023 (UTC)