Talk:Doolittle Report, 1954

{{talkheader}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=

{{WikiProject United States|importance=Mid|USGov=Yes|USGov-importance=mid}}

{{WikiProject Cold War|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Military history|class=Start|B1=n|B2=y|B3=y|B4=y|B5=n|US=yes}}

{{WikiProject Espionage | importance = Low }}

{{WikiProject Articles for creation|ts=20120215141945|reviewer=Nolelover}}

}}

{{Press|subject=article |author=Barlow, Rich |title=Student’s Research Leads to Wikipedia Entry: CAS sophomore sheds cyber-light on Cold War document |org=BU Today |url=http://www.bu.edu/today/2012/students-research-leads-to-wikipedia-entry/ |date=April 9, 2012}}

I removed these comments from the summary because the article shouldn't have meta discussion in it. I don't have an opinion about their accuracy, just that the article should be formatted like an article.

"Kennan's article was in 1947, almost a _decade_ before Doolittle's report and _before_ the Communist blockade of West Berlin and the Communist invasion of South Korea"

"opinion--why would 1954 be the "height" of the Cold War?" 64.132.80.134 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)