Talk:Dot (command)#Proposed merge with Source (command)
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Software |importance=low |computing-importance=low}}
}}
{{merged from|Source (command)|25 September 2019}}
Proposed merge to Source (command)
This should really be a disambig, as . has so many different meanings on Unix — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.89.139.58 (talk) 14:33, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
:Sounds reasonable. Cesiumfrog (talk) 10:50, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
:This would be wrong as the POSIX standard does not define a "source" command. If you like to merge, merge the source command content into this article. Schily (talk) 15:48, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
::Csh does not define ".". How about "Source and dot (command)"? --Arthur2e5 Crap 15:43, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
:::Csh is a nonstandard command and thus has lower precedence with respect to categorization. Schily (talk) 16:40, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
::::Merging source here sounds good to me, the only problem might be some reduced readability in command name. Regarding that disambig request, perhaps I should propose moving to "Dot (command)". --Arthur2e5 Crap 23:40, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on Dot (command). Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=755072255 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110311131157/http://www.howtoguides.com:80/computers/os/unix/shell/dot.mobile.html to http://www.howtoguides.com/computers/os/unix/shell/dot.mobile.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).
{{sourcecheck|checked=true}}
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC)