Talk:Dragon Ball#proposal for dbz and dbgt

I was wondering if we should add the details about the new anime 66.244.95.12 (talk) 02:13, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

:Agreed, there's already a redirect for it, but the article only mentions its existence in the info box. Whatever you do, I'm probably not interested. (talk) 11:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Series comes out in a little over a month. It's fairly significant. Why isn't there a Daima article yet? Why does it just re-direct here? 141.126.92.77 (talk) 11:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

:It already released now, someone really ought to make an article. 2601:406:8480:7940:555C:1516:19B8:E836 (talk) 00:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

:I think there isn't much sourced data for it to be it's own article. YZNisBack (talk) 08:15, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are listed below:

• There are numerous uncited statements throughout the article, including entire paragraphs
• There numerous block quotes used in the article, which I think would be better as prose.
• The lead is very long and contains a table, which is very usual for an article. I think this area needs to be reformatted.

Is anyone interested in fixing up this article? Is not, should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 01:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

{{archive top}}

I think that the topic of Dragon Ball's cultural impact is notable enough to justify its own page, and can probably be expanded upon significantly. I've started a draft for a new page with the content from this one: Draft:Cultural impact of Dragon Ball. Does a split sound reasonable? Di (they-them) (talk) 22:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

:It's been several days with no objections, so I will take that as an affirmative. Di (they-them) (talk) 10:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

{{archive bottom}}

{{Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Dragon Ball/1}}