Talk:Elvish Yadav

{{Old AfD multi |date=21 August 2024 |result=keep |page=Elvish Yadav (2nd nomination)}}

{{Talk header}}

{{WikiProject banner shell |class=C |listas=Yadav, Elvish|blp=yes|1=

{{WikiProject Articles for creation|ts=20231104223156|reviewer=Atlantic306|oldid=1183475527}}

{{WikiProject Biography}}

{{WikiProject India |importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject YouTube |importance=Low}}

}}

Sources

:@Ajeeb Prani could you add the sources for the article? A lot of the things are not yet sourced. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 06:32, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

::I'll add if I find, till then you can remove unsourced additions. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 08:03, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

:::No need to remove, this is a draft and not held to standards of articles. It just needs everything to be sourced when it is submitted finally. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 10:30, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

::::Yeah you are right, It slipped out of my mind. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 11:47, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

:::::@Ajeeb Prani why are you removing everything from a draft? why do you think it is unnecessary? 103.241.226.169 (talk) 11:15, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

::::::Check other living person's article, if you add these type of unnecessary things then the draft won't get published. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 12:18, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

::::::See Tejasswi Prakash, Rubina Dilaik and Rahul Vaidya for example, you don't have to write everything that happened inside Big Boss house here on a living person biography. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 12:30, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

:::::::There is no rule how can be subsection made. If it's make reading easy and logically divided, it can be done. 103.241.226.169 (talk) 12:53, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

::::::::Are you talking about "YouTube career" and "Big Boss career" subsections? Then there isn't much information in those sections so there's no need of subsection. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 13:11, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

:::::::And don't use restore like this. You have removed all between edits like dob & infobox, lead edits & didn't fixed after that. I don't see you trying to contribute by adding anything in the article. 103.241.226.169 (talk) 12:57, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Please see

@Lectonar You have deleted and protected the article in this draft. Reviewers are probably shying away because the page is protected. That's why you review it yourself. –– πš…πšπ™Ήπ™±πšŠπš—πšπš‘πšž 07:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Review

@Spinster300, can you check now? 103.241.226.129 (talk) 13:11, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

:Hello, please source the birthdate. Thank you and kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 18:14, 8 October 2023 (UTC).

=Johannes Maximilian=

@Johannes Maximilian, there so many reliable sources already used in the article. The Indian Express, Times of India, Financial Express, India Today, NDTV.... 103.241.226.129 (talk) 14:54, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

:Footnotes 1, 17, 24, and 37 are obviously flawed; a 1-second look reveals this. Please make sure that your draft is properly sourced. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 14:54, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

::Ok i will recheck and add more sources, Thanks for reply. 103.241.226.129 (talk) 14:55, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

:::Hello, it is not necessary to add more sources, it is necessary to add better ones. Please replace sources that are press releases or have been clearly paid for, and replace them with reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 18:16, 8 October 2023 (UTC).

::::{{done}} 103.241.226.129 (talk) 11:07, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

::::@Spinster300, can you review now? 103.241.226.129 (talk) 07:32, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

:::::Hello, the draft looks okay to me now (as per WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO or WP:THREE), but it is administrator protected for acceptance and publication into the main space, and so most reviewers on WP:AfC will likely not be able to review it. Please enquire at the WP:Tea House for an administrator to review your draft. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 06:44, 21 October 2023 (UTC).

::::::Thanks for your feedback. 103.251.217.233 (talk) 20:45, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

::::::@Spinster300 What are you talking about? It's not protected. -- asilvering (talk) 06:25, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

:::::::Ah nevermind, I see what you mean. If you mean to accept the draft, it should probably be you asking an admin to unsalt the page, not the article creator. -- asilvering (talk) 06:27, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

::::::::Dear Asilvering, thank you for letting me know. I apologise, I did not know what the protocol was in such an instance. I will ask for the page's restrictions to be lifted. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 12:50, 22 October 2023 (UTC).

G4

Hi, I don't believe this article meets G4 because there has been a major change since the AfD in that then he was only a contestant on Big Boss (the Indian hindi equivalent of Big Brother) but since then he has won it which qualifies as a pass of WP:ANYBIO in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:38, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Elvish didn't confess

https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/youtuber-elvish-yadav-supplied-snake-venom-at-rave-parties-to-increase-his-fan-base-noida-police-9221615/

https://reviewron.ae/Shocking-Revelations-in-the-Elvish-Yadav-Snake-Venom-Case--Nes

Under controversy section it says that elvish confessed but he didn't according to Indian express elvish didn't confess but police had evidence so they took him for 14 days of judicial remand. DataCrusade1999 (talk) 06:17, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 19 January 2025

{{edit semi-protected|Elvish Yadav|answered=yes}}

I wanted to edit a from controversies topic smuggling of venom from wild snakes. Under(30) it is written β€œwhere Yadav confessed to arranging snake venom.” This is wrong statement and it should be like that β€œcase is still under vercit and Yadav is not proven guilty for now.” Shanu206 (talk) 02:19, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

{{not done}}: See response below in #Semi-protected edit request on 19 January 2025 (2). Jiltedsquirrel (talk) 21:30, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 19 January 2025 (2)

{{edit semi-protected|Elvish Yadav|answered=yes}}

Elvish Yadav Admits To Arranging Snake Venom At Rave Parties: Sources On 20 March 2024,this is fasle news as final verdict is not passed yet and he hasn’t confessed anything : Sources| https://reviewron.ae/Shocking-Revelations-in-the-Elvish-Yadav-Snake-Venom-Case--Nes|access-date

=2024-03-19|website= Reviewron.ae}}

}} Shanu206 (talk) 02:40, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

{{not done for now}}: The listed source in the article does say that he admitted to arranging venom at raves. Multiple other sources {{cite web |url=https://www.news18.com/explainers/what-exactly-is-elvish-yadav-case-why-is-snake-venom-used-at-rave-parties-what-does-it-do-to-body-8819506.html |title=What Exactly is Elvish Yadav Case; Why is Snake Venom Used at Rave Parties? What Does It Do to Body? |editor-first=Shilpy |editor-last=Bisht |date=18 March 2024 |publisher=News 18}}{{cite web |url=https://www.indiatimes.com/entertainment/originals/elvish-yadav-case-how-dangerous-is-snake-venom-drug-619592.html |title=Elvish Yadav Case: How Dangerous Is Snake Venom Drug And What Do Studies Say About The Addicts? |first=Garima |last=Satija |publisher=Times Internet |date=19 March 2024}}{{cite web |url=https://www.businesstoday.in/latest/trends/story/upto-20-years-in-jail-with-no-bail-for-elvish-yadav-if-proven-guilty-in-rave-party-case-understanding-the-sections-of-ndps-act-421895-2024-03-18 |title=Upto 20 years in jail with no bail for Elvish Yadav if proven guilty in rave party case: Understanding the sections of NDPS Act |publisher=Business Today |first=Tarun |last=Mishra |date=18 March 2024}}{{cite web |url=https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/bollywood/elvish-yadav-snake-venom-case-hearing-gets-postponed-lawyers-strike/ |title=Elvish Yadav – Snake Venom Case: Hearing gets postponed over lawyer’s strike |publisher=Bollywood Hungama News Network |date=21 March 2024}} state that he reportedly confessed. If you can find a plurality of sources which state he did not confess this change could probably be made. Jiltedsquirrel (talk) 21:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}

Semi-protected edit request on 1 May 2025

{{edit semi-protected|Elvish Yadav|answered=yes}}

Offensive remarks against Tiktokers (2020)

In his content, he drew comparisons between the youthful individuals featured in TikTok videos and individuals engaged in the scavenging of discarded items, colloquially known as "ragpickers".[20] Kindly remove the above statement, it is rumoured.

Kindly remove, Sexist remarks against Kusha Kapila (2021)

He encountered backlash for his sexist remarks and insulting commentary directed towards Kusha Kapila, a female comedian and actor. His comments were widely regarded as an instance of online abuse, bullying and ignorance which sparked substantial controversy and disapproval from the online community.[21] This is false accusations.

Kindly remove this , Flower pot theft case (2023)

In March 2023, Elvish Yadav's name was trending in connection with a government owned flower pot theft case. He stated in a tweet that the vehicle shown in the video related to the theft did not belong to him.[22][23] It was falsely accused. The Car and Flower Pot has no connection with Elvish Yadav

Kindly removed this , Discriminatory and sexist comments against Arjun Bijlani (2023)

In September 2023, Yadav generated additional controversy when he misgendered Arjun Bijlani as "a woman". This particular statement, deemed offensive and inappropriate, attracted extensive criticism and condemnation from various quarters.[24][25] Above scenario was just a speculations

Kindly remove the Smuggling of venom from wild snakes (2023)

On 3 November 2023, Noida Police filed an FIR against Elvish and five others after nine venomous snakes, including cobras, were found in their possession. These snakes and snake venom were used at alleged illegal raves.[26] The case was initiated based on a complaint from BJP MP Maneka Gandhi's NGO, who accused Elvish of shooting videos with snakes and hosting unauthorized parties with snake venom and drugs. An undercover operation led to the arrest of five individuals who named Elvish Yadav as the mastermind.[27] Later, on 17 March 2024, Yadav, along with five others, was arrested under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, and Section 120A (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code for arranging snake venom at rave parties.[28] Subsequently, they were sent to judicial custody for 14 days,[29][28] where Yadav confessed to arranging snake venom.[30] On 20 March 2024, the probe against Yadav spread to additional cases in Goa and Punjab.[31] On 22 March 2024, Yadav was granted bail by the Gautam Buddha Nagar district court.[32]This whole FIR was falsely accused by Meneka Gandhi. He had no connections with any kind of Rave Party & Snake Venom Supplier. He has proved no guilty in this case.

Kindly remove Assault and death threats against YouTuber Maxtern (2024)

On 8 March 2024, footage of Yadav, along with multiple companions, assaulting, physically abusing and giving death threats to fellow content creator, Sagar Thakur (known online as MaxTern) at a garment shop in Gurgaon, went viral online. According to India Today, an FIR has been registered against him. The altercation supposedly happened after a social media clash, in which Thakur criticized Yadav for his controversial activities, including his alleged involvement in the snake venom case.[33]. This whole FIR was falsely accused by Maxtern. He had planted whole scenario to get fame from Elvish Yadav.

Kindly remove this Fake lifestyle (2024)

In March 2024, it was revealed that Yadav had been fabricating aspects of his lifestyle to project a glamorous and affluent image on social media. This revelation came from his parents during an emotional interview on a national news channel, where they tearfully disclosed that Yadav's online persona was not reflective of his real life. They claimed that his actions were motivated by a desire to gain social media engagement and attention.[34] This is baseless, nothing of sort claimed by Elvish Yadav

Kindly remove this Offensive Remarks against Bigg Boss 18 Finalist Chum Darang (2025)

In February 2025, Yadav faced criticism for making offensive comments about Bigg Boss 18 finalist Chum Darang during a podcast with Rajat Dalal. He questioned why Karan Veer Mehra would be interested in Chum and labeled her name as "ashleel" (vulgar).[35] He didn't say any of those words as it was all scripted.Doctorenthusiast (talk) 14:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{not done}}: It doesn't matter which controversies are true and which aren't, as there is evidence to support that they happened, and that's all that matters Aston305 (talk) 15:46, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 May 2025 (2)

{{edit semi-protected|Elvish Yadav|answered=yes}}

Kindly,remove the under [20] he has not mentioned any kind of remark "ragpickers".

Kindly,remove under [21]. It has proven a rumored.

Kindly,remove under [22][23], Elvish Yadav has already tweeted "The car doesn't belong to him, has no connections with any Flower Pot. Reportedly, the Police have arrested one Manmohan Yadav in the matter.

Kindly, remove under [24][25].This was a false accusations. They were friends and partying together at the same spot.

Kindly,remove under [30] This was falsely accused by Meneka Gandhi. He has proven "not guilty" & no relations with any Rave Party & Snake Venom Supplier.

Kindly,remove under [33] This scenario was whole heartedly planted by Maxtern to get fame from Elvish Yadav.Later on, he had gained almost 1M in social media.

Kindly,remove under [34]. This is totally a baseless. Nothing of that sort claimed by Elvish Yadav.

Kindly,remove under [35] It was all scripted and the desclaimer was released by the show. He was falsely accused by Chum Darang by playing a WOMEN CARD & NORTHEAST STATE CARD. Doctorenthusiast (talk) 15:28, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{not done}}: No evidence or reliable sources provided for your claims. Aston305 (talk) 15:47, 1 May 2025 (UTC)