Talk:Erdut

Erdut is something of a special case - they're not mentioned in [http://www.nipp.hr/UserDocsImages/Registar%20geografska%20imena%20nacionalnih%20manjina%20RH.pdf Registar geografskih imena nacionalnih manjina RH] which is dated 2011, but I distinctly remember seeing at least three languages on the signposts when entering the municipality, and also street names. A quick lookup of news coverage turns up: [http://www.slobodnadalmacija.hr/Hrvatska/tabid/66/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/39865/Default.aspx Po Statutu Općine Erdut, ističe načelnik, hrvatski i srpski jezik te latinica i ćirilica ravnopravni su] in 2009. So I googled that, and http://www.opcina-erdut.hr/dokumenti/ links to a zipped doc with their statute from 2001 that has that written in plain sight as article 9. So unless someone can find e.g. a contradicting decision by the Ministry of Administration, that I presume oversees the various statutes, Erdut is also a fairly clear-cut case. The omission from the Registar... does not seem to be intentional. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 08:11, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

The State Geodetic Administration [http://www.dgu.hr/default.aspx?ID=23 still links to the 2011 (v1.0) document, without description]. OTOH when I searched for their main registry [http://www.dgu.hr/default.aspx?ID=330 I found that they were recently involved in a merger of two agencies]. It would not be unheard of that something fell through the cracks because of that unrelated organizational change. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 08:16, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

• See; http://www.pravosudje.hr/europska-povelja-o-regionalnim-ili-manjinskim-jezi, IV izvješće, 57. str.--MirkoS18 (talk) 04:38, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

:: Ah, good find. Nevertheless, because the principle is acknowledged both by the primary and by the secondary authoritative source, there's no reason to avoid the notion from the article, but an explanatory note should be added to qualify the information. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 09:40, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Copyright-problem.svg This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Psychonaut (talk) 19:07, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on Erdut. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=756581060 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120330100908/http://www.pravo.unizg.hr/_download/repository/Zakon_o_PPDS.pdf to http://www.pravo.unizg.hr/_download/repository/Zakon_o_PPDS.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:41, 25 December 2016 (UTC)