Talk:Ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka#Request for comment
{{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{Controversial}}
{{Old AfD multi|page=Ethnic Conflict in Sri Lanka|date=10 July 2012|result=keep and improve}}
{{Old AfD multi|page=Ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka|date=27 November 2012|result=keep}}
{{Old RfD|page=2012_August_12#Ethnic_conflict_in_Sri_Lanka|date=12 August 2012|result=article moved over the redirect}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Sri Lanka|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=}}
{{WikiProject Ethnic groups|importance=Mid}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}}
|maxarchivesize = 50K
|counter = 3
|minthreadsleft = 1
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:Ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=Talk:Ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka/Archive index
|mask=Talk:Ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka/Archive <#>
|leading_zeros=0
|indexhere=yes
}}
Replaced with redirect
It would be great if someone could construct a stub for this article. However, I think the best course of action in the mean time is to have a redirect. Thoughts? TippyGoomba (talk) 19:47, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
:No, I'd recommend leaving this as a redirect; a stub will encourage user edits taking us down the same road. I've requested protection for the redirect to prevent this. I would recommend developing a stub/outline in the incubator so users can contribute to the new version there. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:10, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
::That sounds good as well. TippyGoomba (talk) 21:11, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
::: Seems like some users had political motivation. Seems like no one interest to improve the document by a new structure. Reverting back to original since we can't wait our entire life to see a new structure for this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.245.163.53 (talk) 16:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
:::: If you want to write a fresh article, that would be great. The redirect is much better than the old article. TippyGoomba (talk) 06:08, 9 October 2013 (UTC)