Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 1985/GA1

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Eurovision Song Contest 1985/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 1985/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: {{User|Sims2aholic8}} 16:19, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 08:44, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.
2. : a. (prose, spelling, and grammar): {{GAList/check|y}}
3. ::
4. ::
5. : b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): {{GAList/check|y}}
6. ::
7. ::
8. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
9. : a. (reference section): {{GAList/check|y}}
10. ::
    1. ::
    2. : b. (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|y}}
    3. ::
       1. ::
       2. : c. (OR): {{GAList/check|y}}
       3. ::
       4. ::
       5. : d. (copyvio and plagiarism): {{GAList/check|y}}
       6. ::
       7. ::
       8. It is broad in its coverage.
       9. : a. (major aspects): {{GAList/check|y}}
       10. ::
           1. ::
           2. : b. (focused): {{GAList/check|y}}
           3. ::
              1. ::
              2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
              3. : Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
              4. ::
              5. ::
              6. It is stable.
              7. : No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|y}}
              8. ::
                 1. ::
                 2. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
                 3. : a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): {{GAList/check|y}}
                 4. ::
                 5. ::
                 6. : b. (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|y}}
                 7. ::
                 8. ::
                 9. Overall:
                 10. : Pass/fail: {{GAList/check|y}}
                 11. ::
                 12. ::

                 (Criteria marked 14px are unassessed)

                 Another review for you, will get through this today! --K. Peake 08:44, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

• Infobox looks good!
• "and presented by" → "it was presented by" and I would suggest after this, starting a new sentence at where the contest was held
• Per overly short size of the second paragraph, merge this with the first para
• Where is the top five sourced as being the third time?

:*This is included and sourced within the "Contest overview" section, and therefore does not need to be sourced in the lead. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 11:55, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

• Pipe Sweden to Sweden in the Eurovision Song Contest

• Img looks good!
• The second staging sentence reads as too long; I think it would be better if after the first comma, you wrote something like "ten years after the 1975 contest was held in Stockholm." only
• Introduce the full name of the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) here with the wikilink since it is the first mention
• "which was held on the evening of 1 May" → "hosted on the evening of 1 May 1985" to be less repetitive with usage of held

• First para and img look good!
• Listing all of the participating artists in one sentence with so many clauses feels very excessive especially when there are many areas this could be split up; start a new sentence at the Hot Eyes mention that goes into Al Bano and Romina Power, then one for Chips that ends at Mariella Farré; from these examples, I will let you take it from there and then re-assess
• Table looks good!

• "produced by the Swedish public broadcaster Sveriges Television (SVT)." → "produced by SVT." since their full name has already been introduced; do the same for the EBU
• Not all of the info for the second para's last sentence is sourced
• Remove repeat link to the 1975 contest
• Last para looks good!

• First para and img look good!
• "when returning to the stage" → "when she returned to the stage"
• "got caught on" → "and got caught on"
• I don't believe this edit makes sense: this would then make the sentence {{tq|"when she returned to the stage following the interval act the skirt of her outfit [...] and got caught on the set and ripped off in an apparent wardrobe malfunction"}} Sims2aholic8 (talk) 11:14, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• [39][7][33] should be in numerical order
• "win, and marked a" → "win and marked a"
• Table looks good!

• Where are the languages sourced?

:*Thanks for this spot. I've swapped out the ref to cover this. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 11:19, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

• Good

• The passive participants part is not sourced by [30]

:*I've added a source to cover this. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 11:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

• The third sentence of this section does not appear to be backed up by the sources

:*I've double checked these references and I believe they do back up the information in this sentence. I've made a few tweaks, which should hopefully assuage any concerns. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 11:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

• Tables look good!

• Good

• [https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=&oldid=1263384943&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=0&turnitin=0 Copyvio score] is not showing, although there is barely any quoting so it is safe as you can get to check this one off!!
• Wikilink European Broadcasting Union on ref 1
• I have my doubts about the reliability of ref 4, being that all of the writers are contributors and it is a website dedicated to horses

:*Have swapped this ref for a different one which should be considered more reliable. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 11:51, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

• WP:OVERLINK of ARD on ref 22
• WP:OVERLINK of Leeuwarder Courant and Delpher on ref 56
• WP:OVERLINK of National Library of Luxembourg on ref 58
• WP:OVERLINK of National Library of Israel on ref 71
• WP:OVERLINK of Radiocorriere TV on ref 73
• WP:OVERLINK of Delpher refs 74 and 93
• WP:OVERLINK of Dagens Nyheter on ref 81
• WP:OVERLINK of Timarit.is on ref 91

• Good

• Good

• {{onhold}} until all of the issues are fixed; came through in time for this! --K. Peake 14:24, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

:*{{Reply to|Kyle Peake}} Thanks for another super review! I believe I have covered all of your points above. Let me know if there's anything further. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 11:53, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

::*{{Pass}} now, really good job once again and glad to see this after I've been away over the weekend! --K. Peake 09:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)