Talk:Fabio Innocenti
{{Old AfD multi |date=8 July 2023 |result=procedural keep |page=Fabio Innocenti}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|listas=Innocenti, Fabio|blp=yes|
{{WikiProject Olympics|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Biography|sports-work-group=yes|sports-priority=low|attention=yes}}
{{WikiProject Italy| importance=Low| attention=yes}}
{{WikiProject Volleyball |importance=Low}}
}}
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fabio Innocenti. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=802607320 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150722173400/http://www.sports-reference.com/olympics/athletes/in/fabio-innocenti-1.html to http://www.sports-reference.com/olympics/athletes/in/fabio-innocenti-1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
Cheers.βInternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:56, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because even if it is not relevant, that is not csd, it is afd.--πΈπ π½ππππππ πΏπππππ|πΊπ¦πΊπ¦πΊπ¦|βοΈ|π 01:02, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
:{{courtesy ping}}{{Reply to|User:FI369}} πΈπ π½ππππππ πΏπππππ|πΊπ¦πΊπ¦πΊπ¦|βοΈ|π 01:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Article for deletion
This biography article is missing information to show the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article by using multiple sources that meet four criteria. The sources should be (1) reliable (2) secondary (3) independent of the subject (4) talk about the subject in some depth. Additionally, the article lacks coverage about Early life, Career, Personal life, Achievements and honours (if any). Please help this article by adding needed content. JoeNMLC (talk) 14:50, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Protection
At this AfD discussion, it was suggested that the article be semi-protected, but no consensus developed for this in the discussion. My two cents on that question: Protection should not be preemptive, so I would suggest waiting to see if this page becomes the target of disruption again or if this was an isolated incident. Anyway, if the AfD consensus had included protection, I wouldnβt have closed that discussion (WP:NACD).Actualcpscm (talk) 20:37, 22 July 2023 (UTC)