Talk:Feminist views on transgender topics#rfc 56CF0AB
{{skip to bottom}}
{{Talk header|search_term1=feminism|search_term2="transgender"}}
{{WikiProject banner shell |class=C |1=
{{WikiProject Discrimination|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Feminism|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Gender studies|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Human rights|importance=Mid|1=}}
{{WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies}}
{{WikiProject Sociology|importance=low}}
}}
{{MOS-TRANS}}
{{recruiting|March 2019}}
{{section size}}
{{Annual readership |width=570 |days=182}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
|maxarchivesize = 175K
|counter = 6
|minthreadsleft = 4
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(60d)
|archive = Talk:Feminist views on transgender topics/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{Refideas
| {{cite book |last1=Bettcher |first1=Talia Mae |editor1-last=Disch |editor1-first=Lisa |editor2-last=Hawkesworth |editor2-first=Mary |title=The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theory |date=2016 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-1993-2858-1 |pages=407-427 |doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199328581.013.21 |doi-access=free |chapter=Intersexuality, Transgender, and Transsexuality |chapter-url=https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199328581.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199328581-e-21?print=pdf}}
| {{cite book |last1=Cross |first1=Katherine |editor1-last=Carian |editor1-first=Emily K. |editor2-last=DiBranco |editor2-first=Alex |editor3-last=Ebin |editor3-first=Chelsea |title=Male Supremacism in the United States: From Patriarchal Traditionalism to Misogynist Incels and the Alt-Right |date=2022 |publisher=Routledge |location=Abingdon, England |isbn=978-1-0005-7622-1 |doi=10.4324/9781003164722 |chapter=Trans Women and the Invisible Sisterhood}}
| {{Cite news |last=Ferber |first=Alona |date=December 1, 2022 |title=How the UK's only feminist party came out in favour of gender self-ID |url=https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/feminism/2022/12/gender-self-id-trans-uk-feminist-party-support |work=The New Statesman}}
}}
__TOC__
Missing section on "First wave feminism"
Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture 320-03
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/California_State_University_Fullerton/Gender_and_Technoculture_320-03_(Spring_2024) | assignments = Evelynm333 | reviewers = Brookevdo | start_date = 2024-01-22 | end_date = 2024-05-10 }}
ā Assignment last updated by Momlife5 (talk) 15:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture 320-01
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/California_State_University_Fullerton/Gender_and_Technoculture_320-01_(Spring_2024) | assignments = JennyJimenez15 | reviewers = Dochoa14 | start_date = 2024-01-22 | end_date = 2024-05-10 }}
ā Assignment last updated by Bbalicia (talk) 00:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Opening line
Having read various parts of this article the opening line of "feminist views on transgender topics vary widely" seems to be providing WP: FALSEBALANCE to this article. This is because the main article seems to provide the viewpoint that for most countries the vast majority of feminists and feminist organisations seem to be very supportive of trans people and transgender rights. LunaHasArrived (talk) 15:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
: I don't agree. If someone said, "the income of Americans varies widely", I would take that as a true, and unsurprising statement. It just means some people are very poor and some are very rich. It doesn't say anything about income distribution. If they followed that up with, "the fifty richest Americans are as wealthy as the poorest 165 million",[[https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-08/top-50-richest-people-in-the-us-are-worth-as-much-as-poorest-165-million 1]] that wouldn't surprise me, either; income is not spread evenly among the populace. And neither are the opinions of feminists on trans topics. That said, if you find the opening line misleading (which I don't) and you wanted to add something like, "... but tends to be supportive", or "... but is supported by the majority", or "... but has overwhelming support", I would have no objection, as long as whatever you add is supported by a more detailed treatment in the body of the article, and is well sourced. Mathglot (talk) 05:35, 21 February 2024 (UTC)