Talk:Flood geology#Request for reference on temperature change associated with crust transformation
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|ps}}
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=
{{WikiProject Creationism|importance=Top|Young Earth creationism=yes|Young Earth creationism-importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Skepticism|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Alternative Views|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Religion|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Christianity|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Palaeontology|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Geology|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject History of Science|importance=mid}}
}}
{{controversial}}
{{Archive box|search=yes|
- Archive 1 (August 2004–May 2005)
- Archive 2 (May 2005–August 2007)
- Archive 3 (July–October 2007)
- Archive 4 (Nov 2007–Oct 2008)
- Archive 5 (Dec 2008–Oct 2009)
- Archive 6 (January 2010–)
}}
{{Broken anchors|links=
time scale The anchor (#History and nomenclature of the time scale) has been deleted.
}}
__TOC__
{{Clear}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}}
|maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 7
|minthreadsleft = 3
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:Flood geology/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes
}}
Missing sources
There are three short-footnote references whose source information is missing in the article: Snelling 2006, Wilson 2001 and Mathews 2009. If any editors with more familiarity with the subject area than me can track the sources down, please add them in the "References" section at the end of the article. Thanks, Wham2001 (talk) 17:43, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
:Done. tgeorgescu (talk) 23:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
::Excellent – thank-you! Wham2001 (talk) 16:24, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
labelling as "pseudoscience"
The labelling as pseudoscience is not supported by the cited article, which does not provide an actual or multiple examples of the use of pseudoscience. Furthermore the cited article mixes up two examples for the use of pseudoscience. The article cited is not suitable to support the claim. 83.150.41.5 (talk) 14:03, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
:Which "cited article" do you mean? We have several sources for this ignorant claptrap being pseudoscience. --Hob Gadling (talk) 14:27, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Mount Saint Helens
The 1980 eruption of Mount Saint Helens caused many prominent geological events which unfolded just as Creation science and catastrophism says they would. This is documented on YouTube by several different respectable sources. AAEexecutive (talk) 23:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
:Geological catastrophes happen, mainstream science does not deny it. However, creation science is pseudoscience. tgeorgescu (talk) 00:06, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
:YouTube is not a reliable source. Dimadick (talk) 09:18, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
:Okay. If you would like to get some reliable secondary sources that agree with the theory you set forth and add them to the article, you may. OverzealousAutocorrect (talk) 19:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)