Talk:FlyTech Dragonfly

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=

{{WikiProject Robotics|importance=low}}

{{WikiProject Toys|importance=low}}

}}

{{Old AfD multi | page = FlyTech Dragonfly | date = 30 April 2008 | result = keep | date2 = 13 January 2016 | result2 = keep | page2 = FlyTech Dragonfly (2nd nomination)}}

{{refideas

|1=[http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/01/wowwee-branching-out-with-flytech-dragonfly-fcc-reveals/ Reveal] (Dec 2006)

|2=[http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/16/wowwees--flytech-dragonfly-in-action/ Hands-on] (Dec 2006)

|3=[http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/14/wowwees-flytech-dragonfly-reviewed/ Review] (Feb 2007)

|4=[http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/08/wowwees-flytech-dragonfly-now-shipping/ Release] (Feb 2007)

|5=[http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/17/wowwee-dragonfly-chopped-in-half-for-your-perusal/ Chopped in half] (March 2007)

|6=[http://techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/hawks-are-stupid-think-wowwee-flytech-dragonfly-is-real/ TechCrunch] (Feb 2008)

|7=[http://www.slashgear.com/wowwee-dragonfly-takes-first-review-flight-143916/ SlashGear] (Feb 2007)

|8=[http://www.geek.com/review/take-to-the-sky-with-flytechs-dragonfly-567071/ Geek.com] (July 2007)

|9=[http://gizmodo.com/241396/my-cat-vs-the-dragonfly-the-battle-to-end-all-battles Gizmodo] (March 2007)

|10=[http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2094487,00.asp PCMag] (Feb 2007)

|11=[http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/gadgets/a1202/4210607/ Popular Mechanics] (notes that it won a Popular Mechanics Editor's Choice Award at CES) (no date, but it's CES coverage so Jan 2007)

|12=[http://www.wired.com/2006/12/terrify_your_pe/ Wired] (Dec 2006)

|13=[http://www.ign.com/articles/2007/03/20/wowwee-flytech-dragonfly-rc-bug-review IGN] (March 2007)

}}

Untitled

This article needs improvement. Perhaps photos and more detailed specifications. Will try to obtain some which isn't copyrighted. Jaser 12345 20:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

"However, being made of plastic and styrofoam, with plastic, papery wings, It often scratches, rips, or cracks."

Uhh, it is not made out of styrofoam. It uses EPP, which is a high-impact foam. From what I've heard, it is VERY durable. I am taking this sentence out. 132.241.3.240 22:44, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

FCC External Links not working

The FCC filing external links are not working. They come up with an "object not found" error. Someone may want to check up on the links. Javawizard 20:01, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

"Despite its supposedly crash resistant body after repeated use the wings get damaged and will not fly properly" is a completely inappropriate sentence to have in wikipedia unless theres a source attached, and the {{Fact|date=February 2007}} leads me to believe it has none and is original research and someones opinion. Also, crash resistant doesn't say anything about the normal wear and tear of the wings nor does the word resistant implies immunity to the second law of thermodynamics or crashing.

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:06, 29 July 2018 (UTC)