Talk:Foreskin
{{Talk header}}
{{Censor}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Anatomy |importance=Mid |field=gross}}
{{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality|importance=Top }}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|maxarchivesize = 125K
|counter = 6
|minthreadsleft = 1
|algo = old(60d)
|archive = Talk:Foreskin/Archive %(counter)d
}}
History section is a little weak
I don't have time right now (I'll try at a later date) but the history section seems a little sparse. I think we can do better than that folks. 2600:8807:810A:9F80:AA71:899E:5BF9:5027 (talk) 04:19, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
Illogique reasoning
According to the « In the March 2017 publication of the Global Health Journal: Science and Practice, Morris and Krieger wrote, "The variability in foreskin size is consistent with the foreskin being a vestigial structure". » since woman clitoris hood also vary in size and length and do not always cover the head of the clitoris then according to the same logic the clitoris good is a vestigial structure. I see a paradox… 89.187.180.57 (talk) 14:31, 15 March 2025 (UTC)