Talk:Fortran 95 language features

Perhaps you could add there should be a small note that the newest fortran is called fortran 2003, but most compilers implement fortran 95. As far as I can see the present article only described fortran 95... Nice article though.. :)

Check out [http://wwwasdoc.web.cern.ch/wwwasdoc/WWW/f90/language-elements.html Language elements

by Michael Metcalf]. Is that a copyright violation? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.237.79.16 (talk • contribs)

:Well, this page was created by Mike himself

18px (I can witness that, and provide proofs if required). However, the point is moot: I'm not sure what happens if the same text is published under different licenses. I'll try to get a clarification and get back. Duja► 10:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

::There was no license provided on the linked page, so by default, there would be no right to re-use. Whereas Michael himself posted the content here, I would presume that the license he implicitly accepted via submission would carry. (I'm not a lawyer, merely a somewhat-educated lay person.) --Mr Wednesday 23:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

:As User:Duja mentioned, Mike created this article himself. Mike discussed this a bit in a comp.lang.fortran posting at the time (Sept 29th, 2006), saying that it was based on tutorials of his which had no copyright problems. So if anyone has any doubts, use [http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran?lnk=li&hl=en Google] to find the discussion in c.l.f. --Wws 14:42, 6 January 2007 (UTC)