Talk:Francis Mitchell#Requested move 13 May 2025

really? what about admiral cochrane in the early 19th?--Tresckow (talk) 15:44, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Francis Mitchell. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=803927321 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080323125405/http://www.royalinsight.gov.uk/OutPut/Page4877.asp to http://www.royalinsight.gov.uk/OutPut/Page4877.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:32, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

{{requested move/dated|multiple=yes

|current1=Francis Mitchell|new1=Francis Mitchell (knight)|current2=Francis Mitchell (disambiguation)|new2=Francis Mitchell|}}

• :Francis Mitchell → {{no redirect|Francis Mitchell (knight)}}
• :Francis Mitchell (disambiguation) → {{no redirect|Francis Mitchell}}

– There are four men listed upon the Francis Mitchell (disambiguation) page, with no indication that the 16th–17th-century knight left such an outsized footprint upon history that his renown overshadows the combined notability of the remaining three men. The proposed parenthetical qualifier "(knight)" is analogous to such entries as John de Aston (knight banneret), Edward Burgh (knight), John Grey (knight), James Harrington (Yorkist knight), Richard Ingoldsby (knight) or Thomas Tipping (knight). — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 18:40, 13 May 2025 (UTC)