Talk:Francisco Rolão Preto

I think the problem with categorising such things as "left" or "right" is a short sighted view of the time and really since the majority of "these" movements were a "third way", it does apply. For example, attaching a "leftist" claim to something positive in this article is highly dubious;

:"He advocated especially the personalism of Emmanuel Mounier and some of the aspects of unionism which are reminiscent of Leftist ideas of social justice, such as "a minimum family wage", "paid holidays", "working class education", and a world in which workers are "guaranteed the right to happiness"."

These are positive stances, for sure, but "leftist"? When has the left actually come through in practice and "guaranteed the right to happiness". Since when is the "right" against the working class?

Of course the communists and socialists have used some of these as carrots before they killed off the upper classes and threw the working class into slave labour camps or just left them to starve. But I'm quite sure that wasn't Francisco Rolão Preto's goal by supporting the above. Unlike the communists, he was likely genuine in his support of such positive things. - Gennarous (talk) 16:00, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.

Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.

This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.

If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.

If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.

If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.

When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.

The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.

Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.gratisweb.com/resistenciae/t006.htm
• :Triggered by \bgratisweb\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 17:08, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Francisco Rolão Preto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040115181610/http://www.iscsp.utl.pt/cepp/anuario/secxx/ano1932.htm to http://www.iscsp.utl.pt/cepp/anuario/secxx/ano1932.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050406050923/http://www.angelfire.com/pq/unica/il_frp_francisco_rolao_preto.htm to http://www.angelfire.com/pq/unica/il_frp_francisco_rolao_preto.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:19, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Francisco rolo preto.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:37, 4 May 2019 (UTC)