Talk:Friedrich Nietzsche and free will

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=

{{WikiProject Philosophy|importance=Mid|continental=yes}}

{{WikiProject Germany|importance=High}}

{{WikiProject Psychology|importance=Low}}

}}

{{Old AfD multi | date = 29 May 2015 | result = no consensus | page = Friedrich Nietzsche and free will}}

{{Broken anchors|links=

}}

Teaitet?

"To exist is to represent will to power, to cause influence (compare similar views of Protagoras' disciples in Plato's Teaitet)."

. . . in Plato's _what_?! What's a Teaitet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.68.196.118 (talk) 17:46, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

  • In recent version this mistranslation is corrected. 46.77.124.82 (talk) 04:54, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

This whole article is based on original research and should be deleted.

  • Not really; the article is meant to be a collection of Nietzsche's quotes on free will, determinism, destiny, the applicability of morality, and the psychology based on will. The "narrative" parts are only required by good style to connect them in a coherent flow of thought. 46.77.124.82 (talk) 04:57, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Nominate for deletion?

This whole article is based on original research and should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1:8B00:107C:546F:DC4C:148D:2685 (talk) 06:16, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

  • The article is basically a collection of quotes with proportion of interpretation to sources as low as almost nowhere else on Wikipedia. Feel free to mark the statements considered doubtful with the "fact" template, even plenties of them, but it often happens that nobody brings such accusation against a statement. The article itself should exist within pages about Nietzsche's thought, because it is an important topic in his works, much more important than e.g. "riddle of the world" or however it was named. Piotrniz (talk) 23:16, 18 September 2014 (UTC)