Talk:Fundamental group#Point set topologist.27s lede

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=

{{WikiProject Mathematics|small= |importance= top |comment= |ACD= }}

}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

| algo = old(365d)

| archive = Talk:Fundamental group/Archive %(counter)d

| counter = 1

| maxarchivesize = 150K

| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}

| minthreadstoarchive = 1

| minthreadsleft = 3

}}

{{Archive box |search=yes |bot=Lowercase sigmabot III |age=12 |units=months |auto=yes }}

torus

Could someone add the surface of a torus in the example section, in depth? Cesiumfrog (talk) 11:47, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

not so obvious

"if f and g : X → Y are continuous maps with f(x0) = g(x0) = y0, and f and g are homotopic relative to {x0}, then f* = g*. As a consequence (???), two homotopy equivalent path-connected spaces have isomorphic fundamental groups:"

I think we need an homotopy $(X, x_0) \times I \to (Y, y_0)$ (which is very different from an homotopy $X \times I \to Y$) in order to imply "as a consequence.."--193.205.210.32 (talk) 17:07, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Ok! I found the answer in spanier (algebraic topology), although I think that all books about AT work as well.. But I confirm the title of this section after all! --193.205.210.32 (talk) 09:15, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

preservation of coproducts

The article claims that the fundamental group functor preserves all coproducts. This is, in general, false: a counterexample is given by the Hawaiian earring. Michael Lee Baker (talk) 05:36, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

:Ouch, from the Hawaiian earring article:

::G contains additional elements which arise from loops whose image is not contained in finitely many of the Hawaiian earring's circles; in fact, some of them are surjective. For example, the path that on the interval [2n, 2−(n−1)] circumnavigates the nth circle.

:I guess for the coproduct to result you need base points to have contractible neighborhoods or something like that? This error goes way back to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fundamental_group&diff=47378041&oldid=45400004 2006]. --Ørjan (talk) 09:18, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

::Oh well, I've changed it to say locally contractible, I'm pretty sure that's enough. --Ørjan (talk) 09:23, 6 April 2014 (UTC)