Talk:G. Edward Griffin#Survey
{{talk header}}
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|topic=cam|style=long}}{{Contentious topics/talk notice|topic=tpm}}
{{Article history
| action1 = AFD
| action1date = 2006-09-09
| action1link = Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Edward Griffin
| action1result = kept
| action2 = AFD
| action2date = 2008-02-23
| action2link = Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Edward Griffin (2nd nomination)
| action2result = deleted
| action3 = AFD
| action3date = 2008-03-07
| action3link = Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Edward Griffin (3rd nomination)
| action3result = kept
| action3oldid = 196458403
| action4 = WPR
| action4date = 2008-04-23
| action4link = Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Peer review/G. Edward Griffin
| action4result = reviewed
| action4oldid = 152632406
| action5 = AFD
| action5date = 2015-03-10
| action5link = Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Edward Griffin (4th nomination)
| action5result = no consensus
| action5oldid =650765168
| currentstatus =
| itndate =
| dykdate =
| maindate =
| topic = socsci
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|listas=Griffin, G. Edward|blp=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|filmbio-work-group=yes|filmbio-priority=low|old-peer-review=yes}}
{{WikiProject Skepticism|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Alternative views|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Michigan|importance=Low|detroit=yes}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}}
|maxarchivesize = 300K
|counter = 10
|minthreadsleft = 1
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(60d)
|archive = Talk:G. Edward Griffin/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=/Archive index
|mask=/Archive <#>
|leading_zeros=0
|indexhere=yes}}
{{clear}}
Poor and/or biased references
Concerning the claim from the introductory paragraph that Griffin's theories on the Federal Reseve have been debunked, I followed the (single) citation to a book called "Pranksters : making mischief in the modern world" and read the relevant chapters. It does nothing by way of "disproving" the claim, and no actual, fact-based argument is advanced. Instead, it's but a "claim against the claim", a simple statement in other words that what Griffin says is wrong and/or exaggerated, while shame is attributed to the otherwise respectable men who promoted his theories. It's a mark of hypocrisy to call a theory debunked by citing a reference that does not even try to debunk it factually. I believe that this entire claim must be removed from this article, or citations to actual proofs must be found. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.74.254.1820 (talk • contribs) September 2024 (UTC)
:{{notdone}} The source is fine. Bon courage (talk) 15:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)