Talk:G. Edward Griffin#Survey

{{talk header}}

{{Contentious topics/talk notice|topic=cam|style=long}}{{Contentious topics/talk notice|topic=tpm}}

{{Article history

| action1 = AFD

| action1date = 2006-09-09

| action1link = Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Edward Griffin

| action1result = kept

| action2 = AFD

| action2date = 2008-02-23

| action2link = Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Edward Griffin (2nd nomination)

| action2result = deleted

| action3 = AFD

| action3date = 2008-03-07

| action3link = Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Edward Griffin (3rd nomination)

| action3result = kept

| action3oldid = 196458403

| action4 = WPR

| action4date = 2008-04-23

| action4link = Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Peer review/G. Edward Griffin

| action4result = reviewed

| action4oldid = 152632406

| action5 = AFD

| action5date = 2015-03-10

| action5link = Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Edward Griffin (4th nomination)

| action5result = no consensus

| action5oldid =650765168

| currentstatus =

| itndate =

| dykdate =

| maindate =

| topic = socsci

}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|listas=Griffin, G. Edward|blp=yes|1=

{{WikiProject Biography|filmbio-work-group=yes|filmbio-priority=low|old-peer-review=yes}}

{{WikiProject Skepticism|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Alternative views|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Michigan|importance=Low|detroit=yes}}

}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{aan}}

|maxarchivesize = 300K

|counter = 10

|minthreadsleft = 1

|minthreadstoarchive = 1

|algo = old(60d)

|archive = Talk:G. Edward Griffin/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn

|target=/Archive index

|mask=/Archive <#>

|leading_zeros=0

|indexhere=yes}}

{{clear}}

Poor and/or biased references

Concerning the claim from the introductory paragraph that Griffin's theories on the Federal Reseve have been debunked, I followed the (single) citation to a book called "Pranksters : making mischief in the modern world" and read the relevant chapters. It does nothing by way of "disproving" the claim, and no actual, fact-based argument is advanced. Instead, it's but a "claim against the claim", a simple statement in other words that what Griffin says is wrong and/or exaggerated, while shame is attributed to the otherwise respectable men who promoted his theories. It's a mark of hypocrisy to call a theory debunked by citing a reference that does not even try to debunk it factually. I believe that this entire claim must be removed from this article, or citations to actual proofs must be found. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.74.254.1820 (talkcontribs) September 2024 (UTC)

:{{notdone}} The source is fine. Bon courage (talk) 15:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)