Talk:GIMP
{{Talk header|noarchive=yes}}
{{ArticleHistory
| action1 = GAN| action1date = 22:29, 13 August 2009 (UTC)| action1link = Talk:GIMP/GA1| action1result = failed| action1oldid = 306973201
| currentstatus = FGAN
| topic = Engineering and technology
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Computing |importance=Low |free-software=yes |free-software-importance=Top |software=yes}}
{{WikiProject Graphic design |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Open }}
}}
{{merged-from |Wilber (mascot)}}
{{afd-merged-from|GIMP version history|GIMP version history|11 September 2019}}
{{Use American English}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
|maxarchivesize = 55K
|counter = 5
|minthreadsleft = 3
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(180d)
|archive = Talk:GIMP/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{archives|search=yes|bot=MiszaBot I|age=180}}
Out of date Professional Reviews
I'd like to propose deleting the summary of obsolete review in ExtremeTech, October 2013, by David Cardinal.
Many of the features he listed as missing were added in later versions. An eleven year old detailed review is no longer relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.37.3.216 (talk) 02:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Page Structure
Given the length of the versioning section, I would posit that the flow of the article would be greatly improved if it were moved behind the Features section and to the end of the article. Possibly with the table itself being hidden by default as seen in the blender page. Does anyone have any reasons why this should/shouldn't be done. Ixgauth (talk) 17:56, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
Binary Releases
Under "Development" section article says: "GIMP itself is released as source code. After a source code release, installers and packages are made for different operating systems by parties who might not be in contact with the maintainers of GIMP."
This may suggest that there are NO official binary releases, however I can see they're hosting signed binaries at https://www.gimp.org/downloads/ and there is also an official flatpack package at https://flathub.org/apps/org.gimp.GIMP
I found this part a bit misleading. Maybe it's simply outdated. Can someone clarify? SleeptightAnsiC (talk) 22:16, 24 March 2025 (UTC)