Talk:GNRI AEC Class#Merging proposal
{{Merged-to|Irish AEC railcars|26 May 2025}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WikiProject Ireland|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Trains|importance=low}}
}}
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to {{plural:2|one external link|2 external links}} on GNRI AEC Class. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=699898442 my edit]. If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090504133231/http://eiretrains.com:80/Photo_Gallery/I/Inchicore/slides/AEC%20railcar%206111%20at%20Inchicore_2.html to http://eiretrains.com/Photo_Gallery/I/Inchicore/slides/AEC%20railcar%206111%20at%20Inchicore_2.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090505153343/http://eiretrains.com:80/Photo_Gallery/I/Inchicore/slides/Cab%20of%206111%20at%20Inchicore_2.html to http://eiretrains.com/Photo_Gallery/I/Inchicore/slides/Cab%20of%206111%20at%20Inchicore_2.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
Cheers.βcyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:03, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Merging proposal
{{Discussion top|result=The result of this discussion was to merge. βππ πππ±ππ (talk) 13:47, 26 May 2025 (UTC)}}
The article UTA AEC Class (which has only one source mentioned) is more or less a mere duplicate of GNRI AEC Class, other than (likely unsourced) extra information for two extra power cars mentioned in the former. It would more beneficial if both articles be merged into one. CIE 2600 Class, however, must be kept as a separate article, as despite the AEC and 2600 classes sharing the same design, the latter has enough information and notability to warrant itself its own article. EditorGirlAL07 (talk) 21:33, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
:I second this. A unique page for the southern and northern railcars is just about notable enough to stay separate, but the page for the UTA railcars is just detailing the same railcars after their nationalisation. Actually, I think we should extend this to include the CIΓ page too, as 10 of the GNRIβs identical stock would end up with CIΓ after their dissolution. The two extra railcars mentioned in the UTA article either should receive their own page or be removed from the article, as they have little in common with the other UTA railcars. βTwinBoo (talk) 15:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
{{Discussion bottom}}