Talk:Gallery grave#Merger proposal

I propose that Transepted gallery grave and Wedge-shaped gallery grave be merged into Gallery grave. There simply is not enough content in either article to justify their own article. I surveyed the literature, and neither could be improved much (even when fully cited and with more info added). Rather, "transepted gallery grave" and "wedge-shaped gallery grave" could be easily be explained in the context of "gallery grave", which would provide much-needed context. "Gallery grave" is of a reasonable size that the merge will not cause the article size to swell or give undue weight. - Tim1965 (talk) 16:56, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

:Yes, merge - The others are barely stubs, and would be fine as sections of this article. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 20:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

:Agreed and {{done}} Klbrain (talk) 22:52, 20 December 2017 (UTC)