Talk:Garhwal Kingdom#Requested move 23 May 2025

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Garhwal Kingdom. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=804778210 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090410075651/http://pauri.nic.in/Glo_Past.htm to http://pauri.nic.in/Glo_Past.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090410080921/http://uttarkashi.nic.in/Public/history.htm to http://uttarkashi.nic.in/Public/history.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:35, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

{{ping|Ekabhishek}} you provided the date 823 in an old edit to this page, without adding a citation.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Garhwal_Kingdom&diff=prev&oldid=272011021]

{{User|Tarbooj}} later entered 888 in the infobox,[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Garhwal_Kingdom&diff=prev&oldid=453364926] but not changing your text that still says 823.

Can you provide a citation to resolve this inconsistency? – Fayenatic London 09:18, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

:Thanks. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Garhwal_Kingdom&diff=822968745&oldid=821088447] – Fayenatic London 23:16, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

{{requested move/dated|Garhwal kingdom}}

:Garhwal Kingdom → {{no redirect|Garhwal kingdom}} – [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Garhwal+Kingdom&year_start=1870&year_end=2022&corpus=en&smoothing=5&case_insensitive=true Sources don't usually cap kingdom] here. Dicklyon (talk) 05:47, 23 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 09:47, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

:Kingdom of Garhwal? Blueboar (talk) 14:53, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

::A few of the ancient Indian kingdoms are done that way; most not. [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=the+Kingdom+of+Garhwal%2Cthe+kingdom+of+Garhwal%2Ckingdom+of+Garhwal%2CKingdom+of+Garhwal%2CGarhwal+Kingdom%2CGarhwal+kingdom&year_start=1870&year_end=2022&corpus=en&smoothing=5 More stats]. Dicklyon (talk) 23:48, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

• Support The ngrams don't have enough results for a wildcard search eg Garhwal kingdom * but google shcollar ([https://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?start=10&q=%22Garhwal+kingdom%22&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5 here]) is quite convincing that this is not consistently capped per MOS:CAPS and WP:NCCAPS. Cinderella157 (talk) 06:47, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
• Support Kingdom of Garhwal per consistency with almost every other kingdom (e.g. Kingdom of France, Kingdom of Italy, etc.) 🐔 Chicdat  ^{Bawk to me!} 22:45, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
• :That is not the pattern for most of the ancient India kingdoms. Dicklyon (talk) 03:49, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
• :[https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Kingdom+of+Garhwal%2Ckingdom+of+Garhwal%2CGarhwal+Kingdom%2CGarhwal+kingdom&year_start=1920&year_end=2022&corpus=en&smoothing=3&case_insensitive=false Here are more n-gram stats] to include that alternative. Note that it would still be lowercase kingdom when non sentence-initial. And Gahrwal kingdom is historically much more common. Dicklyon (talk) 03:55, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
• :By the way, that [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Kingdom+of+Garhwal%2Ckingdom+of+Garhwal%2CGarhwal+Kingdom%2CGarhwal+kingdom&year_start=1920&year_end=2022&corpus=en&smoothing=0&case_insensitive=false spike up in usage in 2022] appears to be from [https://books.google.com/books?id=U456EAAAQBAJ&pg=PT23&dq=%22kingdom+of+garhwal%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwijlqC-_MmNAxXtMDQIHRzNN1oQ6AF6BAgFEAM#v=onepage&q=%22kingdom%20of%20garhwal%22&f=false this one self-published book]. Dicklyon (talk) 01:00, 30 May 2025 (UTC)