Talk:Genentech

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=

{{WikiProject Companies |importance=Mid}}

{{WikiProject History of Science |importance=Mid}}

{{WikiProject Molecular Biology|genetics=yes |genetics-importance=Mid}}

{{WikiProject California |importance=Low |sfba=yes |sfba-importance=High}}

}}

Key People need to be updated

Most of the "Key People" section is outdated. Pascal Soriot isn't the CEO anymore. Ian Clark is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.12.78.250 (talk) 20:59, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Wasn't this company in Jurassic Park, or something?

Wasn't this company in Jurassic Park, or something? 24.30.140.142 (talk) 02:14, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Congressional Statements Ghostwritten by Genentech

See http://cryptogon.com/?p=12119 and http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/us/politics/15health.html?_r=1&hp —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.148.208.105 (talk) 14:35, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Collaborations

User:Ceyockey as I noted in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genentech&type=revision&diff=739925898&oldid=739903849 this edit note], collaborations structured like this are common as dirt. if the scare quotes are to avoid any hint of copyvio, i have revised it in that diff. Hopefully that is OK.

As for picking this one collaboration out of [https://www.google.com/search?q=genentech+research+collaborations&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS689US689&ei=3NbdV92NHsjj-QGTxYDwCg&start=10&sa=N&biw=1356&bih=819 many], I don't get it. this is why I said TRIVIA. but i won't fuss over that. Jytdog (talk) 00:00, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

:Agreed and removed. This is undue weight for one collaboration that shows no significance over the many others, as demonstrated above. -- Dane2007 talk 00:40, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

::we edit conflicted at the article... that section was pretty crappy anyway so i wrote some new sourced content to serve as a section lead and have added some others. OK? will continue to add others. not sure the Carmot one is major enough to be there but i had kept it and just added stuff around it. i don't mind it being removed -- but it will be buried by the much more significant ones when i am done... Jytdog (talk) 01:10, 18 September 2016 (UTC)