Login
Login

Talk:Germanwings Flight 9525

{{ArticleHistory

|action1 = GAN

|action1date = 15:28, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

|action1link = Talk:Germanwings Flight 9525/GA1

|action1result = listed

|action1oldid = 685563075

|action2 = FAC

|action2date = 2023-03-10

|action2link = Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Germanwings Flight 9525/archive1

|action2result = failed

|action2oldid = 1143668142

|itndate = 24 March 2015

|otd1date = 2016-03-24

|otd1oldid = 711647199

|topic = Transport

|currentstatus = FFAC/GA

}}

{{talkheader}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|1=

{{WikiProject Aviation| b1 =y

| b2 =y

| b3 =y

| b4 =y

| b5 =y

|Accident=y}}

{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=High}}

{{WikiProject Disaster management|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject France|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Germany|importance=Mid}}

{{WikiProject Spain|importance=Low}}

}}

{{British English}}

{{merged-from|Andreas Lubitz|17 April 2015}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{aan}}

|maxarchivesize = 150K

|counter = 6

|minthreadsleft = 2

|minthreadstoarchive = 1

|algo = old(60d)

|archive = Talk:Germanwings Flight 9525/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{Top 25 Report|Mar 22 2015 (6th)}}

Featured article candidacy

{{Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Germanwings Flight 9525/archive1}}

Recent theories

Here's an interesting new theory, suggesting this wasn't a suicide but a medical emergency: https://avherald.com/h?article=483a5651/0164&opt=0

This is not from a random blog, but from the editor of The Aviation Herald, which is generally highly regarded. Let's see whether this gets picked up by other WP:RS. — The Anome (talk) 16:10, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

:There are indeed some very cogent points in that piece, some of which relate to apparent failures in the investigation. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:30, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

:The alleged FCU glitch should be verifiable. If it is confirmed, a reassessment by aviation safety bodies seems mandated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Narkittos (talk • contribs) 17:36, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

''10th Anniversary'' section includes speculative theories unrelated to the anniversary

I wonder what the long essay ("Before the 10th anniversary … with such conspiracy theories.") about new theories has to do with the 10th anniversary of the tragedy and memorial services. I suggest that new theories and investigations get their own section outside of 10th anniversary. -- David Spalding (☎ ✉ ✍) 21:37, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

:Quite agree. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:40, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Added a "Speculative theories" section to "Aftermath". I note the whole section under Tenth Anniversary (which I've retitled to be consistent with Second Anniversary) was added anonymously. -- David Spalding (☎ ✉ ✍) 16:06, 26 March 2025 (UTC)!