Talk:Graham Rossini#Request for comment on paid editing and Did You Know

{{Template:Did you know nominations/Graham Rossini}}

{{atop|status=Procedural close|result=This discussion has been procedurally closed as it was opened in the wrong venue. This discussion may be of value to the Wikipedia community but the talk page of this particular article is not the correct venue for this discussion. The initiator is invited to open a discussion at WT:DYK. Adam Black ^{talk • contribs} 00:30, 24 April 2025 (UTC)}}

{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1748368878}}

{{rfc|policy|rfcid=5EE3285}}

Is it appropriate for articles created for payment to appear on Did You Know. Thriley (talk) 17:28, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

• Yes, if (and only if) proper disclosures have been made. In other words, if the COI guideline and the paid editing policy have been followed, I think we should allow it, but of course, violations should be disqualifying. I'll also add the caveat that if a reviewer feels that, as a result of COI bias, the page might not meet our notability requirements, that's a valid reason to fail the nomination. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:18, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
• This really should be at WT:DYK, but yes per Tryptofish.--Launchballer 20:37, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
• Yes, given that the reviewer believes that the nomination is not for advertising or promotional reasons (as in WP:DYKNOT), or the page is nominated by an independent editor. Justiyaya 00:34, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

:I don't think this is an appropriate venue for this RfC. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 22:56, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

• Procedural close, incorrect venue for such a discussion. Flibirigit (talk) 23:49, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

{{abot}}