Talk:Group of Nine

{{Old AfD multi |date=5 May 2021 |result=keep |page=Group of 9}}

{{talkheader}}

{{notaforum}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|

{{WikiProject Austria|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Belgium|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Bulgaria|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Denmark|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Finland|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Hungary|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Romania|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Sweden|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Yugoslavia|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Kosovo|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject North Macedonia|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Montenegro|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Serbia|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Slovenia|importance=Low}}

}}

recent mentions section

Removed the section for following reasons:

first of all the reference doesn't seem to cover the statement. Assuming he did say it,

  • are we sure he was referencing the Group of nine, and not some more recent mentions of G9 in relation to G8+china? [http://fpc.org.uk/publications/ExpandingG8China].
  • Given the group of Nine's limited focus on cooperation within Europe. Seems like comparing apples and oranges.
  • why would it even be relevant. It seems like a purely political statement. possibly poorly researched by speech writers.

Pinfix (talk) 12:52, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... there are sources supporting its existence. --―Justin (koavf)TCM 18:23, 10 October 2019 (UTC)