Talk:Gu Hua

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... They are many reference. such as [http://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=1213979&mobile&categoryId=200001097 Korean encyclopedia refer him as seperate title] --정과 (talk) 04:52, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

:Also you can find reference in chinese wikipedia. --정과 (talk) 04:54, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

{{quote box|source=Moved from User talk:Callanecc|quote=Gu Huais notable and not only chinese references but also korean encyclopedia(Doosan Encyclopedia) wrote about him as seperate article. [http://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=1213979&categoryId=200001097 see this] [http://www.doopedia.co.kr/doopedia/master/master.do?_method=view&MAS_IDX=101013000874930 see this] --정과 (talk) 07:14, 15 October 2012 (UTC)}}

::I couldn't follow the first link so I'm not sure what it says. Regarding the second, since I don't know what criteria need to be met in order for a subject to have it's own page I can't comment on whether or not that makes Gu Hua notable. However it does seem like a claim of notablity so I'm going to remove the CSD tag and take the article to AFD instead. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:26, 15 October 2012 (UTC)