Talk:Gyeongju
{{Talk header}}
{{Article history
|action1=PR
|action1date=15:00, 21 July 2005
|action1link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Gyeongju/archive1
|action1result=reviewed
|action1oldid=19303615
|action2=FAC
|action2date=14:18, 4 August 2005
|action2link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Gyeongju
|action2result=promoted
|action2oldid=20263560
|action3=FAR
|action3date=18:09, 15 October 2009
|action3link=Wikipedia:Featured article review/Gyeongju/archive1
|action3result=kept
|action3oldid=320019764
|action4 = FAR
|action4date = 2022-04-02
|action4link = Wikipedia:Featured article review/Gyeongju/archive2
|action4result = demoted
|action4oldid = 1078643979
|currentstatus=FFA
|maindate=November 8, 2005
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Cities}}
{{WikiProject Korea|importance=Top|skgeo=yes}}
}}
__TOC__
Featured article rewiew needed
This 2005 WP:FA promotion was last reviewed in 2009 and has not been maintained to WP:WIAFA standard. Unless these issues can be addressed, the article should be submitted for a Featured article review:
- There are external jumps within the text.
- MOS:DTAB
- For non-English-language citations, the |title= and |trans-title= parameters should be used.
- There are considerable dead links.
- There is extremely dated content everywhere one looks, samples only, but the problem is pervasive:
- As of December 2008, the city government employed 1,462 people.
- Like most of South Korea's smaller cities, Gyeongju has seen a steady drop in population in recent years. From 2002 to 2008, ...
- MOS:SANDWICH and poor image layout.
It does not appear that the article has been maintained since its 2009 FAR; a top-to-bottom rewrite is needed to maintain FA status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
This article is so good
😭😭😭 Such good work.
Let's get the Seoul article in better shape; it's currently not doing so good. toobigtokale (talk) 19:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC)